blugatch.tube
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish ·
edit-2
1 年前

Gee, what could go wrong with a ~50,000 pound vehicle that's potentially an automated death machine?

hexbear.net

message-square
33
link
fedilink
121

Gee, what could go wrong with a ~50,000 pound vehicle that's potentially an automated death machine?

hexbear.net

InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish ·
edit-2
1 年前
message-square
33
link
fedilink

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/self-driving-tractor-trailers-us-roads-aurora/

https://archive.ph/SGbTF

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 年前

    Something something torment nexus.

    If only there were a way to link up a bunch of trailers on wheels, but they could have their own road, next to the one for cars. Theoretically, it would only take a couple of people to operate such a vehicle, because the road would have rails. But alas, no such thing exists

    • moujikman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 年前

      But then a philosopher could operate a switch between two moral dilemmas, do you really want /that/ reality.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 年前

      Nope sorry that’s impossible.

      Instead the roads will be filled with hallucinating death machines.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Something something torment nexus.

      Or

      Torment Nexus - Keep on Truckin’ Edition

      -–

      Edit

      Or

      Torment Nexus Mobile

    • HexBroke [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      deleted by creator

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 年前

    Within 3 or 4 years

    very-intelligent

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      2014: “By next year we will have fully autonomous driving”

      2015: “By next year we will have fully autonomous driving”

      2016: “By next year we will have fully autonomous driving”

      2017: “By next year we will have fully autonomous driving”

      …

      2024: “Within 3 or 4 years we will have fully autonomous driving”

    • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 年前

      melon-musk

  • moujikman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 年前

    With no accountability, accidents become a social cost, which the government is ultimately responsible for. Inaction is negligence.

  • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 个月前

    deleted by creator

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 年前

      There’s TikToks to ban!

  • chickentendrils [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 年前

    With how strange reality’s been lately I could see this being the Skynet we actually get.

    Think you can just nuke them while they recharge on commandeered solar? Good luck, they’ve dogpiled the silo magic-conch-shell

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 年前

      roads rendered occasionally inoperable by roving bands of unmanned semitrucks that got disconnected from the hivemind rocketing around?

  • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 年前

    There was a company that was already running automated semis between exits iirc. They did a deal with Budweiser at one point.

    Google says it was Otto.

    https://money.cnn.com/2016/10/25/technology/otto-budweiser-self-driving-truck/index.html

    There was also a competitor that intended to use remote drivers for the complicated parts of the trips. I’m sure that’ll go well.

    • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 年前

      There was also a competitor that intended to use remote drivers for the complicated parts of the trips. I’m sure that’ll go well.

      Genius, it’s not like the complicated parts tend to be mountainous with poor connectivity or anything.

      • CyberSyndicalist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 年前

        this is a terrible idea even in ideal conditions, anyone who’s played a videogame can tell you that it’s easy to crash driving with wireless latency.

    • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 年前

      Self driving trucks but they have to be escorted by someone in a car, but that’s cheaper because they don’t have to have a CDL, and you innovate by connecting multiple trailers onto the truck in a row so you basically have Uber drivers piloting Australian road trains.

      • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 年前

        the car is also self-driving, there’s only one person in the car and they’re expected to take over the self-driving car and the self-driving truck if needed because hey, what are the odds that both self-driving features will fail at the same time?

    • Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Remote drivers seem even worse than an AI would be. Imagine is the internet connection is spotty.

      • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        But think of the savings! Lol.

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 年前

    Fast & the Furious 1 type situation where they open the back of these trucks on a highway to loot the valuable Blu-ray players inside with no resistance from the AI.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 年前

    There’s a Stephen King short story about all the trucks “waking up” and going on killing sprees. It’s called… wait for it…

    spoiler

    Trucks

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 年前

      lmao Hollywood really picking up his editors’ slack renaming that Maximum Overdrive

  • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 年前

    One might have thought self driving trains would have been an easier project

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 年前

    Within three or four years,…

    Next year it will be “three or four years” too.

  • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 年前

    If they were using Chinese tech, I’d honestly trust it a lot more. Their self driving is so far ahead of anything else I’ve seen.

    • wtypstanaccount04 [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 年前

      Nah I wouldn’t even trust Chinese tech to do this. You shouldn’t be automating semi trucks, full stop.

    • PointAndClique [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      deleted by creator

  • POKEMONGOTOTHEGULAG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 年前

    Thanks Pete

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 年前

      He’s been too distracted with all the good news Governor Noem has been publishing about her dogs.

  • tactical_trans_karen [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 年前

    The year is 2030, burgerlanders are rarely seen on the roads. Roving gangs of autonomous trucks rampage about any paved roadway and crush anything that the AI recognizes as organic. The people hide in fear when convoys come to town to deliver their treats, quickly gather them when they are dispensed, and scatter like cockroaches in the light. In their hovels, they cherish the fine quality wares from China, and quietly coo to themselves “thank you Jeff Bezos, thank you Ronald Reagan, thank you John Wayne… thank you for our… freedoms”. agony-deep

    • PaulSmackage [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

  • coffeejoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    They should keep the self driving portions of any road vehicle physically separate from any remotely accessible portion. We don’t need to make giant r/c cars and trucks a normal thing all over the place. Imagine them moving as a swarm. That’s a lot of power with too little oversight.

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    Simpsons did it

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 629 users / day
  • 1.46K users / week
  • 2.5K users / month
  • 5.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 13.9K subscribers
  • 21.9K Posts
  • 329K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • ZoomeristLeninist [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
  • gaystyleJoker [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org