• bigbrowncommie69 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t get why they don’t just make these villains self-interested megalomaniacs like the old days. Focus the drama on the protagonist instead.

  • TheChemist [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    Perhaps they realized that, late into production, the audience would sympathize. So they added him blowing up the city to make him irredeemable.

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or the Marco Inaros Faction in The Expanse, or Magneto in the old X-Men movies, and so on and so on. It’s basically mandatory to have antogonists with a relatable agenda commit acts of cartoonish evil out of nowhere to make it clear that the only answer to injustice is incrementalist fuckery in aliance with macchiavellian ruling class ghouls.

        • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Especially because Mystique in the movies had such a strong anti-assimilationist energy. Answering the question why she doesn’t always look like a human with “because it shouldn’t be necessary”, having a literal shapeshifter refuse to obey passing dictates is fucking powerful for me as a trans woman.

            • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              I didn’t think of it that way when i originally saw the movie, i was still an egg back then, but nowadays, it fits so well. I doubt it’s intentional given the time the movie was made in, but things can work as metaphors for topics the authors didn’t have in mind at all.

        • Ericthescruffy [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Genuinely one of the most egregious and frustrating character assassinations I’ve ever seen in one of these things. I know on some level all of these stories are dependent on who is behind the typewriter so its impossible to say what a character actually would or wouldn’t do but its just such a fucking infuriatingly simplistic view not just of the mutant civil rights allegory but also of how a character like magneto would perceive their struggle. Haven’t finished X-men 97 yet but the plot point with what happens to Storm and his response feels like a direct fucking response to that scene in Last Stand TBH.

          • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, that was a great moment. Rest of the series is just as good, 97 is just a great show. I’m sure there are flaws here and there that just aren’t coming to mind but it’s shockingly good for recent Marvel content made by Disney.

            Real shame about the show runner, I’m assuming s2 won’t happen or will be worse.

      • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Marco Inaros

        Yessss… The belt had too many legitimate grievances and reasons to go to war, so Marco has to go full pride obsessed joker mode. At least Drummer, Ashford & co get a couple good belter pirate moments before they join a corporate alliance with empire.

        • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which includes paling around with literal war criminal Avaserala who tells them how important tolerance is while she plans a counter revolution with Earthers and Martian and Belter collaborators who all hang out in the same luxurious lounge built by wealth pressed out of Belter workers who do not even own the air they breathe. She literally oversaw the torture of Belter PoWs personally in S1.

  • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You can definitely tell they they went … whoops and tacked on the last 30 minutes of the movie to make him seem like the bad guy. The entire film goes into a severe tonal shift.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fucking looooooove Batman and so badly want there to be a movie where the villain captures Batman and opens his eyes to how wealth dynamic of Gotham is the real driving force behind all the crime.

    Bruce learns that the Batman persona was just a veil for him to be recognized as an anonymous hero versus a Nepo baby who is so disconnected from reality that he thinks that building structures and donating them to the poor, destroying infrastructure, beating up the disenfranchised, and terrorizing the commoners of Gotham at their lowest points is benefiting anyone other than Gotham’s upper echelons.

    So then Batman instead loots all the billionaires, destroys businesses with poor workers’ rights, murders a few corrupt figureheads, and then reveals himself to be Bruce Wayne whose cowl was only masking his privilege. Finally, he sells his properties, donates his businesses to the people actually running them, and puts all of his money into trusts that pays every citizen of Gotham a living wage.

    The final scene of the movie shows a happy Bruce Wayne, no longer conflicted by his family legacy, clocking in for his shift as a security guard. He hears a commotion and finds a supervisor assaulting their employee and talking about “crunch time until the product meets the investors’ standards.” Bruce interrupts and starts monologuing while fiddling with a batarang: “You know, I used to use these as a non-lethal deterrent when I was more like you. Back when I punched down on the citizens of Gotham. But now I only punch up. And my weapons got a lot sharper!” Then he murders the fuck out of the boss. Cut to black.

    • vegeta1 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the newer comics gotham is literally cursed. Arkham basement has a portal to hell, a warlock sleeping under there for thoussnds of years cursing the land. Comics have the funniest ways of explaining why people with technology and power that makes them functionally gods would choose to keep the status quo that produces insane criminals. Just say you wanna sell books bruh its alright i-cant

      • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        you didnt enjoy beating up anarchists spouting leftist rhetoric while playing as a rich kid with issues??? smdh

        also they want to blow up half of Gotham for… reasons, too.

        fuck that game had some sussy writing disgost

        • robinnist [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The anarchist leader was just a kid who hadn’t grown out of it and gotten a job yet!! Some people just don’t know how the world really works, like those homeless people he saved from being brutalized by cops who sympathize with Anarky more than him (naive!!). Wait hold on I have to put down these “riots” (we see nobody being harmed except corrupt cops, who Batman was already forced to knock out numerous times at this point, but it’s different when he does it, and even after he clearly witnesses the police not only working for crime bosses but abusing innocent poor people he’ll still call them to sort out every issue after he’s done with it) and then do a grand bomb disarming finale (it’s always bombs, but don’t worry as I can put off disarming the bombs for however long I want and nothing will happen) before I can beat up the evil doctor who put innocent cops and security guards in danger to save his wife from the rich dude Batman was too stupid to realize was clearly evil!! This is very different from the first Anarky side mission where I had to disarm bombs because the stupid anarchists weren’t standing right next to them defending them from me as they exploded!!

  • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They need to play Batman like a straight cop next time. Literally just a brutal private security elite, killing anyone and destroying proof of Bill Clinton’s crimes aboard the Lolita Express.

    • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 months ago

      Really good article. Reminds me of this banger:

      Morgana’s ethical awakening, her rejection of the system from which she has previously benefitted, and her identification with the oppressed, is specifically shown to stem from empathy and moral outrage at injustice… and yet, somehow, without any rhyme or reason, when she finally departs Camelot and openly goes over to the other side, she becomes a sadistic psychopath with no regard for the suffering of the innocent, acting from motives of thwarted ambition, petty jealousy and irrational vindictiveness. Her political awakening comes from compassion and simultaneously nullifies that compassion. It couldn’t be clearer: political outrage, no matter how well intentioned, instantly becomes dangerous the moment it steps beyond the boundaries of the state, of the mainstream, of the legal, of reformism, of consensus political normality.

    • r9seng [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bless your soul! I read that several weeks ago and wanted to find it again but could not remember where it was.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    I keep saying to any liberals that claim the Joker is about White Male RageTM is that if it was, then Arthur would have recruited those wall street bros and now here, the Riddler would give white collar criminals a high five.

  • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Carnival Row was a fun show, but down the line, they talk about a country that recently did a successful worker revolution.

    At first it’s understandable worried about foreign agents. And then, for literally no motivation at all, it’s intimated that certain civilians are being DISAPPEARED and everybody must not remember they existed for COMMUNIST REASONS. People don’t have enough beds and that’s blamed on gommunism (where were all the beds pre-revolution???) And when they try to export the revolution they killed civilians because… uh… honestly it’s not clear at all. They just start opening fire and say killing the civilians will somehow cause a revolution.

    It wasn’t the best show, but it was otherwise neat, so this just double annoyed me.

  • Yeat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love this movie but yeah that plot point came out of nowhere and didn’t really seem consistent. Seems like a flooded Gotham would be a cool set up for a sequel though