Do dummies actually think she’s more “radical” than Biden? Maybe if we beg madam hard enough she’ll give us healthcare! 
“There are ways to get people’s attention. This isn’t it”
Something something inevitable.
It does make me wonder why folks like that protest at Harris events but not Trump events, given what Trump has said about how he’d handle Palestine.
They think they can maybe sway Harris/the dems in general. Not unreasonable, seeing as IIRC they stand to potentially lose Michigan due to its (relatively) large muslim community which will likely have reduced turnout if her policies stay the same.
There is no convincing Trump or the repubs. Their voter base LOVES genocide. The only people who aren’t onboard are some of the more extreme neo-nazis, who only disagree because they hate jews (I note here that Israel is not representative of all jews, and to claim so is anti-semitic, but these are neo-nazis) more than they hate muslims.
Sway them into what? A Trump victory?
Edit: Oh okay. You think these protestors can stop Harris from funding Israel. But any leftist who points out how pointless it is to convince neoliberals to not do neoliberal things is… a neoliberal?
I know this is exceedingly hard for liberals to understand as the only thing they stand for is a status quo where they aren’t challenged to think about anything beyond their order on the brunch menu, but there are many living, breathing, thinking human beings who are opposed to genocides and wish to see them stopped even if it’s being executed and/or funded by the country they live in.
So you believe it’s possible for leftists to convince the Dems to stop funding Israel?
Personally, I think that just demonstrates a childlike naivety.
Oh no I don’t because the existence of the American state itself (and its middle eastern colony Israel) is the actual issue, but you’ll never see me getting upset at people attempting to stop a genocide even if I think the likelihood of their tactics succeeding is low because they, like me, are opposed to genocide.
That said their tactics are heightening the domestic contradictions in the US and drawing increased scrutiny and contributing towards real economic damage to Israel and any actions that lead to further destabilization of that country are exclusively good things so that it isn’t able to sustain its global and decades-long campaign of terror on the world.
Your comment is a prime example of papertigery imperialist intimidation tactics
So what do you propose? You’re sitting here attacking other people because they don’t agree with fucking genocide and treating their protest as a non-issue in the grand scheme of things.
So what’s your plan??
Don’t think of it from a harm-reduction mindset. If YOU don’t vote for somebody against genocide, then YOU lose to Trump. It’s not on us for having a sense of what is right/wrong in the world.
I didn’t say genocide was on you. Who here has said that??
And why shouldn’t people view this in terms of harm reduction? The women in my life are scared shitless about a federal abortion ban, meanwhile so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
The women in my life are scared shitless about a federal abortion ban
so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
Hang on a second, if you’re going to talk about the victims of the abortion ban, then it’s only logically consistent to talk about the Palestinians being genocided, or the Palestinians whose families have bombs dropping on them. Comparing the victims of the abortion ban with not the victims of the genocide, but the people protesting it is being entirely deceptive.
So tell me, what of the Palestinians who have bombs dropping on them or on their families in Gaza; do you think they’re not scared shitless? Do you think they’re less scared than the women in your life?
What that individual is trying to say, but is too much of a coward to say it with their chest, is: The loss of life of a Palestinian is less concerning to me than the pain a white woman might endure.
Now the scared yanks have two options:
I: continue getting their rights taken away by the abusive system they worship
A: Turn on the system that betrayed them and work towards its destruction
I was in that situation once, I took option A.
so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
what spin doctor horseshit. If Amerikan women are cosigning genocide, then they’re not my countryfolk, that’s just the opps at that point. If you’re going to position the comfort of Amerikan women versus the VERY LITERAL LIVES OF A SOVEREIGN NON-WHITE PEOPLE, then you deserve worse than what Gaza is getting. Genocide. Is not. An option.
It is entirely deceptive of this person to compare the victims in one case not versus the victims of the other, but the people protesting it. He knows if he compares the victims of the abortion ban versus an entire nation of people being starved to death and having bombs dropped on them the answer is fairly straightforward, so instead he compares the former with protesters against genocide. I can’t even tell if this person knows they’re being deceptive or if liberal brainworms are just this bad.
The protestors want to pressure Harris/the dems so that they stop providing unlimited aid to Israel’s ongoing genocide. Do you think that cutting aid to Israel would cost the dems more electorally than wholeheartedly enabling the genocide would?
Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them? If Biden literally shot a Palestinian child in the face on stage, would that do it? What about SAing a Palestinian?
I ask because realistically speaking doing these would lose the Dems the election, and yet the genocide is exactly this except in the thousands. You’d never expect people to vote for either of these people if they publicly did something heinous, and yet the genocide is exactly something heinous, just not as in your face as the president doing it on stage.
Of course there is. If Harris shot a child and Trump said he’d shoot 10 children, who would you rather deal with? Or is that a hard choice you’d rather not make by avoiding voting?
It’s like women’s rights in relation to abortion. The vast majority of leftist men who seemingly don’t care if a Trump admin results in a federal ban, and would rather spend their energy convincing themselves that they can dissuade Dems from supporting Israel.
Fix what you can but don’t delude yourself into thinking you can fix what you can’t, and then berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks.
If this, if that…
Liberals don’t live in the real world
Of course they don’t, if they did, they’d actually learn lessons.
If Harris shot a child and Trump said he’d shoot 10 children
Are you being deceptive on purpose or did you just misunderstand my question?
I didn’t ask if Harris shot a child and Trump promised to shoot 10/more who would you rather deal with, I asked if Kamala simply shot a child, would that be enough for you not to vote for her? Literally, right now, you switch on the news and see every channel telling you Kamala just shot a Palestinian child in the face and you see the video of it, meanwhile Trump is making zero claims about shooting any children; do you still vote for her? To reiterate my question: Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them?
The point of the question is that you and I both know she’d lose either every Dem voter or the vast majority of them, meanwhile an actual genocide is taking place where many, many more are dying and the same people who’d stop voting for her because of her shooting a child wouldn’t care about the tens of thousands who’ve died sight unseen.
Let me put a second question up as well: Why should Biden or Kamala bother going to any more debates? Who cares? Literally as a voter you have a choice between either Kamala or Trump, and you’re supposed to vote for Kamala, so why should she bother going to the debates? What are the Dem voters going to do about it, not vote for her and get Trump instead?
I’ll even give you the answer to the second question: It’s because Kamala’s supposed to be trying to win; it’s literally the same reason they’re supposed to stop supporting the genocide. If they’re not putting in the effort to win, how is that the fault of the people who won’t vote for them? This goes back to the first question: shooting a child in the face would lose them the election (although the purpose of the first question is to point out people are more bothered with the evil they can see than the monumental evil they can’t/won’t).
and then berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks
And what task is that? Literally what task do you think people are berating you for? Everyone who is no longer voting for the Dems right now just want Kamala/Biden to stop supporting genocide, it’s neither Sisyphean and nor is it directed at the people who are voting for Kamala, and as you were the one to bring it up, tell me: do you think Biden/Kamala ceasing support for genocide is Sisyphean? Simply not sending weapons at the very bare minimum?
And please don’t try to be deceptive again; you can clearly see what I’ve posted here so don’t pretend I asked a question I didn’t.
If Harris shot a child and Trump said he’d shoot 10 children, who would you rather deal with?
Then I wouldn’t vote for either of them as I would not want to have “child murder” become something trivial that the Dems feel they can get away with. I would not want a child murderer to be legitimised and approved by way of my vote. This also isn’t an answer to the question, which you are attempting to evade.
The vast majority of leftist men who seemingly don’t care if a Trump admin results in a federal ban, and would rather spend their energy convincing themselves that they can dissuade Dems from supporting Israel.
If you’re trying to make a comparison like this, then you have to compare the causes and the victims, not some made-up guy you’re mad at.
Fix what you can.
You are delusional if you believe you are fixing anything by trivialising genocide as a political cause. Letting this slide isn’t some minor policy issue and you’re both deranged and immensely stupid to think that it is.
berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks.
That is quite literally what you are doing right now
I wouldn’t vote for either of them as I would not want to have “child murder” become something trivial that the Dems feel they can get away with
This is what I tell the libs I know: by far the biggest danger in this election is the “good guys” finding out there are zero consequences for doing an active genocide right out in the open.
Do you not perceive the entire Democrat establishment giving full throated support of a genocide while endorsing college kids getting the shit kicked out of them and moving to the right of Trump on immigration as the death knell of the party? Yeah the DNC might exist as an entity for the next 100 years but you’re delusional if you think that there is anything there other than “But Trump is worse” to offer people. Harris has been abandoning any policies that even hint at being progressive at a break neck pace and has made it painfully clear to anyone actually paying attention that there is zero daylight between her and Biden. They can’t even pretend to care about immigrants anymore and are falling back to “Well yes we haven’t actually done anything to defend women or LGBTQ rights but at least we’re not actively trying to murder them.”
But any leftist who points out how pointless it is to convince neoliberals to not do neoliberal things is… a neoliberal?
If you’re voting for Harris and are telling political activists not to agitate for an end to genocide, then you’re just supporting neoliberalism. It doesn’t matter wether or not you’re feeling super fine with it, if all you’re actually doing is supporting the status quo and working against those that seek to improve it.
You think these protestors can stop Harris from funding Israel.
Yes let’s not agitate for political rights, I’m sure they’ll just wake up and decide not to be ghouls tomorrow
because Harris says one thing and does the opposite, while trump straight up says he supports the genocide.
Trump isn’t courting their vote, Harris is. Trump isn’t saying he wants what they want, Harris does.
Trump is a republican and as such would never be able to get the leftist vote, democrats are, which is why leftists try to reason with them.deleted by creator
That doesn’t strike you as naive? Believing the USA of all countries will stop funding Israel because of protestors?
Protests ended Jim Crow and helped stop the Vietnam war and highlighted police brutality that finally caused convictions, why not defunding Israel?
deleted by creator
Absolutely. I was being general to facilitate a good faith conversation, but that turned out to be pointless.
deleted by creator
You believe the two are comparable? Seriously?
The Vietnam war involved forcing Americans to fight a BS war. The average American hardly feels the same kind of impact in relation to Israel, which is why you don’t see protests against the USA/Israel right now on a scale anywhere near those that happened during the Vietnam war.
As for George Floyd’s death, it took the largest protests in American history to take 3 cops to trial to be found guilty.
I don’t think your comparison makes sense and it’s leaving out so many factors about USA/Israel.
Why aren’t these protestors calling Trump out at his rallies? They know neither party will cut ties with Israel, and it seems folks in this thread are torn between acknowledging this while simultaneously claiming the Dems minds’ could be changed by these protestors. Just seems painfully naive.
I gotta ask. How many of y’all here are POC or women, and how many are white dudes?
Your smug naivete only turns people off to whatever cause you think you have. By simply saying these protests won’t work, you follow in the footsteps of those who told civil rights leaders that they were too radical and needed a different approach. Your political imagination is too limited to see a better world beyond our current one, so you belittle and shame others who fight for righteous causes because your soul is corrupted by capitalism and you like it. You fight others because genocide has no affect on your calloused, propagandized heart. You care only about being right and care nothing about righteous causes. You are deeply unserious.
How many of y’all here are POC
Would it kill you to just say Black you peckerwood motherfuck
Nice crackerjacketing by the way, you fucking disgust me and they should probably let another Langley uniform run your account. There’s an entire Black enclave on this fed, but you out here talm bout “how many” cracker shut the fuck up
EDIT, because as a matter of fact? I got a whole raft of ‘actually-Black’ critique for your misleader queen right the fuck here. Twenty-eight articles ranging back seven goddamn years written by the Blackest men and women I know. Folks I organize with, folks who’ve hosted seminars that I’ve been to, folks that actually have principles and standards that they live by that no peckerwood is going to cudgel them out of.
I pray you get caught up in this guilty country’s deserved retribution. On everything I believe in I pray you get caught up in it.
Removed by mod
As for George Floyd’s death, it took the largest protests in American history to take 3 cops to trial to be found guilty.
you are very domesticated
I gotta ask. How many of y’all here are POC or women, and how many are white dudes?
I hate when people like you do this. Nothing screams cracker more than condescendingly believing everyone that doesn’t think like you is white.
Everything about your posting history screams cracker. You are a fucking sundodger, I can see it in your posts.
Everyone pushing back against you is an actual POC. That’s why they don’t think like you, because only white people think and act like you.
It is, but at least the peoples doing that are trying to stand up to the genocide machine unlike you bootlickers.
Removed by mod
Berating everyone who doesn’t want to vote blue because of the genocide to “hold their nose and vote blue” = bootlicking the Dems.
Removed by mod
Criticizing these protestors = bootlicking Dems?
The way you’re doing it? Yes.
I really wish you bros would get past the edgy teenage phase.
It’s edgy to be against genocide.
These protestors want attention on themselves more than the issue they’re protesting.
Lmao talk about telling on yourself, Jesus christ you’re a shitty person. If you can’t conceive of people protesting to end a genocide for any other reason than clout then you are fucked in the head. Either that or there’s a good person in your social circle and you’re mad people like them more than you lol.
Cum and also blocked
grow some spine, grow some morals, whatever. I am not even mad. Just a tiny bit sad to see another person w/o empathy mistaking being jaded for being adult.
deleted by creator
The best way I’ve heard it described is like this: Republicans are werewolves outside the cabin openly howling for blood. I expect no consideration from them.
Liberals are other humans in the cabin with us who, despite professing to hate and fear the werewolves, refuse to hand over the silver bullets or lock any doors. I have been told that they want what I want, so their constant capitulation to the werewolves’ demands arouses baffled frustration.
Republicans don’t even try to pretend to give a fuck about anyone that’s not white/cis/male/straight/ Christian/ western.
Unlike Democrats who have made it their identity
Her VP staff had an enormous turnover rate because she was such a horrible manager.
Former staffers said she never prepared for meetings. She resonates with vibes based people so much she operates off them instead of the briefings prepared for her, allegedly.
had to go re-read that article for fun
Staffers who worked for Harris before she was vice president said one consistent problem was that Harris would refuse to wade into briefing materials prepared by staff members, then berate employees when she appeared unprepared.
“It’s clear that you’re not working with somebody who is willing to do the prep and the work,” one former staffer said. “With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence. So you’re constantly sort of propping up a bully and it’s not really clear why.”
1312
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Imagine going to a diplomatic meeting this unprepared lmao.
“Hello Mr. Amlo- what’s that? Who the fuck is Claudia? SHEINBAUM?? You’re telling me the president of México is a woman called CLAUDIA SHEINBAUM? What happened to president Amlo? What do you mean that’s not his name?.. excuse me Mr president Amlo Sheinbaum, I have to throw a stapler at my staffer. I will return in a moment to discuss how we can traffic- uhh stop traff- stop the trafficking of drugs across the border.”
lol. lmao
She’s presently a blank canvas that libs can project all of their own wants and desires on.
Funny enough the chuds pulled the same shit with Trump, still do to some extent too.
That was the cleverness of MAGA, say we’re going to make America great again, but avoid specifics about when it was last great or what made it great at that time. Let the piggies fill in the gaps for themselves.
She’s not a blank canvas though. She has a record, she has positions - and more importantly we know the positions she abandoned when she ran for president in 2020. That makes radlibs thinking she’s going to be any different than Biden is silly
They did the same thing with Obama, projecting positions that he he had never held onto him to make him the candidate they wanted him to be.
“Obama is the key to the future of America! He’ll bring us universal healthcare and close down Guantanamo Bay!”
Libs don’t look at records or positions or policies. They watch someone talk a few times on TV and base their opinions on if they liked that TV
An empty pantsuit, if you will.
They only need to gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss the public for three more months. I could see them just riding the wave of letting people project their ideals onto her.
Of course that means it’s her election to lose, just like Hillary. So I’m trying not to underestimate her ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
This feels like a repeat of 2016, and back then I genuinely thought that Hillary was going to win.
All the polls pointed to Hillary winning and then she just lost.
It’s going to repeat again for kamala
deleted by creator
Gonna be another won the popular vote, lost the actual thing that decides who is president
1000%
It feels like it but theres a difference. Unlike 2016, not only is there no alternative. But there was and we go it. Genocide Joe was pushed out. “If you arent in the K-hive now then what were you complaining about. You were just complaining for its own sake”
There were warning signs about the polls in 2016. The only thing that got mentioned was the national polls. The HRC friendly media downplayed it though. People have learned their lessons and analysis is more nuanced these days.
The hard part of polling in 2024 is not ignoring swing states but in figuring out who is going to turn out to vote and who isnt.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/kamala-harris/
More disapproval for Harris than approval
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
She’s leading national presidential poll against Trump, like Hillary.
I found a source that said she’s leading trump in a few states. But I really don’t see a difference between now and 2016.
I mean look
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/michigan/
Hillary was dominating trump in 2016 in Michigan and then she just lost it come election day.
Edit: and Harris barely beats trump in the battleground states. Polls really showed Hillary crushing trump in swing states, more so than Harris.
Man, so if she wins we watch all the libs deride the left to ‘give her time to change policy direction’ from brunch her entire first term… or if Trump wins we get to watch them rediscover all the Biden policies they forgot they hated and have em blame the left for not turning out to fix them…hmm I can’t decide which libererun i’d rather see.
If she wins we’ll be told they didn’t need us anyway.
If she loses it’ll be because of us.
Walz is the cream of mushroom soup holding together the hot dish that is the Democratic party
Well actually Trump is going to do genocide+ so you commies are the ones really responsible for supporting genocide.
deleted by creator
Pretty good. I always want to ask them what Trump would do that Biden hasn’t but by this part of the argument, I’m usually so frothing mad that I’m calling them disgusting Nazi scum and getting banned from whatever forum we’re on.
I’ve had a lot of liberals telling me that “Kamala has to play politics” and that we can’t criticize her because we are fighting fascism (she isn’t a fascist presiding over a genocide, obviously). I have found they get really indignant when you ask them what other groups besides Arabs/Muslims whose lives they think it’s OK to “play politics with” in order to “defeat fascism”. Black people? Trans people? Migrants?
You don’t ‘play politics’ to defeat fascism if you truly are attempting to defeat fascism, historically fascism wins that game every time.
Tell the liberals that.
What do you think I just did?
I think you just called me a liberal for criticizing liberals for saying Arab/Muslim lives are worth less than others. Do you have some Zionist sympathies you would like to share?
Funny; that’s exactly how they defended Obomber while he was blowing Syrian and Libyan civilians to a finely-macerated fuckin paste. During his second administration I hate this fucking country.
There’s just a very blatant anti-Arab/anti-Muslim bigotry that runs through all of their reasoning (as well as some people in this comment thread, apparently). People always talk about “hypocrisy” but that’s basically just a thought-terminating cliche. When people engage in hypocrisy, it’s because there is some other thought/ideology that they are using to guide their reasoning, and in cases like this, it’s bigotry/racism.
This take was posted seriously yesterday on .ml
Liberals after Trump wins will do Genocide Plus Pro Max
Its infuriating seeing people who should know better act like she’s anything other than what we already know she is! Harris isn’t an unknown quantity. We already know she is like every other neoliberal that ran in 2020, except she was even worse at running a campaign than any of them but Beto lol.
She’s a complete ghoul and radlibs are pretending she might not do genocide because…? Vibes?
something about the sheer force of the hopium makes me think she’s going to explode into a fireball in the general. this is going way too smoothly for the democrats not to find a way to fuck it up.
deleted by creator
Only people on this site would get me when I say I’m utterly baffled how I’m watching the exact same force that “organically” coalesced to endorse Biden in 2020 when
was about to run away with it. Not like he would’ve done anything, but think about how much of a threat a negligible tax increase posed.Absolutely terrifying how organized the bourgeois are. How do people not recognize that they’re just as subservient to US capital as the people of the CPP are to socialist characteristics
How do people not recognize that they’re just as subservient to US capital as the people of the CPP are to socialist characteristics
They recognize it just fine. They simply do not care. Remember a lot of Americans think of themselves as “temporarily embarrassed billionaires.” Or their adherence to the white, cisshit, male power structure means they will gladly stamp out anything that threatens that power.
Despite the obviousness of the DNC rallying around Biden during the primary, they still got more people to vote along the party line. They still had to get the majority of votes for Biden and that’s exactly what happened because so-called liberals want to uphold American hegemony more than they want healthcare or education.
They don’t care about Gaza. They don’t care whether or not she’s radical. They just say she is to piss you off. At the end of the day, Harris is in her white house. All is right with the world.
It seems like the media blob has decided to remove the mandate of heaven from Trump and give it to Harris. She has managed to stay untainted by Genocide Joe’s regime and now she has the advantage of being seen as a blank slate that people can project whatever they want on.
If he campaign is smart and let her say as little as possible, she can probably keep the show going long enough to win.
Once in office things will be different as nothing will fundamentally change and the decay will continue, paving the way for whatever the next iteration of American fascism is going to look like.
deleted by creator
I think it was on Trueanon they said that lots and lots of libs are desperate to return to the good old days of not having to care about politics and that Kamala is good enough for them to be able to do so.
Well “pressure her”!! How? By saying we’ll still vote for her even after acknowledging she supports genocide!!
deleted by creator
Them: We can push her to the left!
Me: Like the genocide protestors?
Them: No!
But don’t actually pressure her, that’s bad politics. Good politics is when you vote for the democrats and if you vote hard enough you get to hope they do something you want. I am a leftist just like you, which is why I spend all my time telling people that they should unconditionally support the democrats and also nothing good is possible so don’t even work towards achieving anything, just sit down and shut the fuck up and vote for the democrats uhhh comrade… It’s what Marx would have wanted, which I know because I am a leftist just like you.
Also you’re not a leftist, you’re a red fash tankie idealist naive bro
We can pull her left
We did it with Biden and it worked!
