HarryLime [any]

  • 1.25K Posts
  • 1.97K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2020

help-circle
  • Maybe I should have been more clear, but I’m talking about fiction or literary non-fiction. Men only being given a diet of self-help grindset book is part of the problem I’m worried about. Like, when I was in high school and college, you could be a “bro” kind of guy and read Chuck Palahniuk, or Hunter S. Thompson, or David Foster Wallace. For decades, authors like Hemmingway and Bukowski found receptive audiences in young men, not to mention all the crime fiction, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy that men have traditionally consumed. The “guy in your English class who loves David Foster Wallace” was a stereotype for a reason. But now it seems like younger men just straight up see no value in reading literature or fiction, because the algorithms just railroad them into Alpha Gridset world. Am I wrong about this?





  • Please just remove it, there’s no way it’s real. There’s just no way a person living in the first half of the nineteenth century with as powerful a command of the English language as Mary Shelley would be quoted saying something as blunt and dull as “you have to read and think a lot,” not to mention that it sounds downright anachronistic. I’m not even sure the terms “left wing” and “right wing” would have been in common parlance during her life.

    Plus the picture of her face is completely wrong. The whole thing, from the quote to the picture, looks AI generated.

    Edit: Also, it’s just not fucking true! There are plenty of right wingers who read and think a lot! This is pissing me off so much