Pros: it will be exciting and engaging to see someone with a federated name and the notice their opinion being dogshit

Cons: mathematically proven to not have cons

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      6 months ago

      As one of the rare non-hexbear who still sees hexbear content and occasionally comments, yeah this is the issue. Hi everyone!

      • DayOfDoom [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        My team and I are analyzing all 132 of your comments. R&Ding the perfect dunk. Be prepared.

        Every further comment you make only increases the metricized dunk-matrix quotient.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Go for it. It’s mostly that it makes others not want to interact with you guys. I obviously don’t really care that much. You don’t convince them of anything except maybe making them dislike you, so the opposite of what you should want. I know it enforces group think and makes others in the group feel more attached so they don’t leave really, but it’s not going to turn anyone new into a leftist.

          • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sadly true. Even if we don’t have aspirations of being on the lib to left pipeline, we definitely scare people off by being overzealous with dogpiling.

            I think people should be more patient with those who have lib-smelling inquiries, but I’m all in favor of bullying the bad-faith posters incapable of questioning their assumptions. I see more of the latter than the former, which is why I think so many here are quick to start roasting.

            I find it amusing when there are threads with half the responses are giant walls of text trying to explain things and the other half pictures of a pig shitting on its testicles.

            Makes me wish Lemmy supported having both federated & unfederated comms or per-comm federation lists, so we could have federated 101-type spaces where dunks are explicitly removed, and unfederated shitposting free from intrusion.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              I totally agree bad faith arguments deserve all the shit they get. I just think the comment “shitting on” good faith arguments do more harm than good. There are a ton of bad faith arguments. I, personally, just tend to ignore or rebut their claims so it doesn’t hurt anything. The hexbear version of dunking on them doesn’t promote anything good and at best turns the single person posting on it away. The ideal is to convince other viewers of alternatives.

              • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                If someone’s posting bad faith arguments I would rather not waste anyones time interacting with them, they’re certainly not there to be educated.

                Chasing them off with mockery seems like the least bad option, if the other options are giving it credibility by trying to respond or ignoring it.

                The problem is discerning the difference between the two can be inconsistent, leading to some users effort posting while others mock.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Totally agree. Bad faith arguments don’t deserve the time or effort. If you do spend the time, at least spend it aware other people than the OP may see it.

                  I also agree there is no reliable way to tell bad faith from good faith, at least before they contradict themselves, but that takes time.

              • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                What many people take offense to, is the fact that a lot of “good faith” arguments are still repugnant, and frankly not always distinguishable (hope thats a word) from bad faith arguments.

                To give you an example that I’ve seen quite a lot: Like the current situtation with the Middle East, where you see liberals of all kinds either straight up supporting Israel’s genocide, or clamoring for a millitary intervention against the Ansarallah movement governing Yemen. If you (general you, not you specifically) don’t know what that movement is about, or just how popular it is, or what they have been going through for the past decade, I don’t give a flying fuck what kind of argument you make, you are not going to understand why their actions are in fact rational (and also legal, but that’s a separate issue). Same with the Ukraine war, same with the October 7th attacks, same with a potential war against Iran. If you (again, every you is general, not as a reply to you) genuinely believe that people outside of the United States can afford to act against the United States based solely on the reason that they’re evil, or hate the west or some other moron-grade explanation, you are going to be dunked on, because your opinion is at best worthless and can at best become a learning opportunity, but more likely will just result in the lib in question taking their ball home and blocking us.

              • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                comment “shitting on” good faith arguments

                I can count the number of good faith arguments I’ve heard from lost libs on one hand

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            This is one of those things that does a good job of demonstrating for normal social cohesion mechanisms are villified when observed in fringe groups. You have no problem insulting and condescending and yet criticize us for the same, even as people have been nice to you. I don’t care to flatter the sensibilities of whoever the next NATOist shitlib is telling me about asiatic hordes, they are clearly not interested in learning. What matters are the people who don’t have the same moronic confidence that the NATOists do.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              My problem is that a lot of the people here think that insulting people who mostly agree with you is the norm. Sure, inform people of what’s going on and what’s wrong with their justification, but “dunking on them” isn’t going to change their opinion. It doesn’t matter how many times they see the image of the pig shitting on its balls. It’s not going to change their mind. The ideal should be to change people’s opinion. We should be trying to create more leftists, not trying to create more anti-tankies.

              • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                My problem is that a lot of the people here think that insulting people who mostly agree with you is the norm

                Ok provide one or two examples of this happening. Cause I’m always there for the dunking and even I’m amazed at how consistently, almost universally shit lemmy users are

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Do you think I just save examples like this to share? It happens, and we all know that. There’s really no need to prove it. I’ve got an example of a fairly well cited critique that I did here a while ago that only got shitty responses of people trying to dunk on me, or just unwilling to acknowledge what I said. I’m not searching through my entire history to find it though, but if you want to feel free.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Your argument is useless because you’re bundling a bunch of behaviors together without substantiation while taking a very narrow view of what interactions do and what their purpose can be (ignoring my counterexample at the end).

                As an aside, NATOist shitlibs and “I disavow Biden while taking Pompeo’s line on foreign adversaries” types are a) materially identical and b) completely antithetical to my ideology, not my cute little neighbors who prefer mousse over fudge or whatever minor affectation we are worried about protecting here.

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m gonna be honest with you zip, being disliked by lemmy users is not the knockdown you think it is

            I’ve always maintained lemmy users who joined the last six months are the dregs of reddit who make normal redditers look well-adjusted and poltically coherent, and my assertion has yet to be proven wrong

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not just that you’re disliked. It’s that you are only scaring people away. If you wanted to be effective then you’d at least try to be convincing. I’m fully aware most Lemmy users at large are terminally online people who only want internet points, but supposedly Hexbear is leftist, and part of that should be trying to make other people leftist to create actual change. That doesn’t happen by posting a picture of a pig shitting on its balls.

              • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I’ve unionized in real life and I’ve come to the conclusion that only two things can change a person’s mind to adopt more leftist politics, at least in a group setting. (Individually people are all over the place and random stuff can happen in their lives)

                The only two things I’ve been able to use are: offering them something or embarrassing them. You offer them a good union deal, or you have enough comrades together to shout down any dissenters. The internet probably doesn’t work quite that way but who knows. We’re not here to convince people of anything, we’re here to relax or have a laugh.

                You’re probably right that more people here should try to answer good faith questions. But most of us are here in the first place out of frustration. We all feel alone and alienated in our daily lives, so it’s nice to come around and chill with like-minded people. Our first instinct when we see someone dissenting is with the same frustration we typically feel. We’re too stressed.

              • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                lmao we are under no obligation to “convince” some online dipshits who already made up their minds, the onus is on them to come to us in good faith, not for us to bend over backwards to rid them of some dumbass neo-nazi brainworms they picked up from browsing 4chan for ten years

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Who said anything about an obligation? I said that it should be desired.

              • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                6 months ago

                Tbh I don’t think anyone is ever going to be convinced online. Hexbear is mostly a safe space for communists and other sympathetic parties to hang out. If someone sees the content and wants to participate then they’ve been activated elsewhere. If they don’t, then I doubt any amount of performative civility would undo the propaganda filling their skull and would only create a less safe space for our minority comrades.

                Changing minds is the purview of real life interactions

              • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Getting my ass dunked on actually helped me grow politically. Everyone repeats that whole line about how civility and kindness are the best way to convince people, but I’m skeptical, seems like one of those things everyone says cuz everyone says it. It works in certain circumstances, but a lot of ignorant or arrogant people will just abuse your kindness and use it to validate themselves. Jerking them off just makes it worse. Embarrassing them and making them feel humbled is often much more effective.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It depends on context, but I’m not saying you should jerk them off. I’m saying insulting generally (and this is a well studied well understood thing) causes people to shut down. They won’t read beyond the first sentence if they’re being insulted. I’m not saying you have to give their opinion any weight, because it likely doesn’t deserve any. I’m saying, if you’re spending the time to engage, you should do so in a way to ensure (particularly for other readers) you’re making allies and not enemies. Point out how stupid and/or ignorant their argument is. Don’t just insult the person, which doesn’t make anyone think you know what you’re talking about any more than the other person does.

                  Like you said, humble them. Don’t insult them.

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean, pretty much anytime we let any libs in here, they inevitably do something damaging to our more vulnerable comrades

    Probably for the best that we carry out the occasional raid on them rather than let them skitter in the rafters like mice

    • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Honestly, my main gripe with Hexbear is the amount of dunk tank type content. I come here because I’m tired of seeing those shitty opinions. Not that I don’t enjoy it from time to time, but it’s more the proportion. It’s the junk food of posting.

      This place has so many knowledgeable comrades posting useful resources and helping people learn that I’m willing to drudge through the birdsite screenshots to find the nugget of gold.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    Those first few days were wild. They were so legendary that liberals still talk about us in hushed tones on instances we can’t even see or post on. They accuse one another of being secret hexbears, it’s great.

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Me and two other users kept some shitty meme at the top of the page for 3-4 days because we kept dunking on an ever-increasing influx of libs lol. It was great, one of them didn’t understand the concept of “source critique”.

    • GaryLeChat@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Every now and then they complain about hexbear in our threads lol as if we’re not on good terms. I do miss getting to dunk in threads on the worlders (or rather watch others do lol)

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        i’ve learned so many things from interacting with lemmygrad comrades. The phrase “debate pervert” is one of my favorites. I don’t know if y’all coined it, but y’all are who I learned it from. Also the tales of wisconcom are delightful

  • goose [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    The few days where lemm.ee wasn’t sending any activity federated servers really put a damper on things. I had to make a hexbear account just to get my fix. Don’t tell anyone

  • CARCOSA [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I commented in another post but there aren’t any other lemmy instances out there that arent:

    1.) Already federated with us 2.) Blocking us 3.) We aren’t federating because for various reasons including (large amount of reactionaries that threaten the safety of our marginalized users, host content that is bad (porn or loli), or have a site feature that invalidates one of ours)

    At the current moment when you look at the https://join-lemmy.org/instances

    You can also see our allow/block lists at hexbear.net/instances

    please correct me if i’m wrong

    Based on activity from 11k user per month to 100 user per month: