• JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The word “b*rbarian” is a racial slur invented by the Romans and Greeks to attack non-romans and non-greeks, after the sound “barbar”, which was basically the Greek version of “ching chong” for making fun of foreign languages. You shouldn’t be throwing slurs like that around so casually.

          • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I’ve seen the slur used to justify racism across two thousand years of history. I’ve never seen it used by one who spoke as though with the compassion of Jesus Christ in their heart.

            • BennyCHill [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              You know that 420 is Hitlers birthday and a Nazi dogwhistle right? If that sounds loke a stretch to you you have no right to complain about an even older and less relevant offensive term

              • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                8 days ago

                I hope that young lady has accepted Jesus into her heart, but I fear it may be unlikely, as she’s waving the flag of a state that’s actively collaborating with the genocide of the Palestinian people

            • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I’ve seen the slur used to justify racism across two thousand years of history. I’ve never seen it used by one who spoke as though with the compassion of Jesus Christ in their heart.

              I could say the same about the pathetic fucking religion of most modern Christians. The same one that you can’t even fucking understand, nor would you care to since you apparently rate things on the “Jesus-O-Meter” in the hearts of people. Two thousand years of history and the legacy of the Catholic church and the legacy of Jesus Christ is the piles of bodies at Canadian residential schools, likely close to millions of children sexually abused (I would know since the church I worked at got shut down over it, no, I’m not a priest) and a regressive, backwards institution dedicated to upholding reactionary and exploitative practices globally.

              “uhhh nooo I’m actually a protestant-baptist-calvinist-quaker-latter-day”

              You know what Matthews said, get back in your fucking closet.

              • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                The “Christianity” of the Romans is truly a plague as you say. It is the most blatant heresy in history. To associate Jesus with Christianity is even fouler a lie than the myth taught to children today that Karl Marx was an authoritarian.

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      We just haven’t done capitalism correctly” is a real deadend opinion, my guy

      At a certain point, we all have to put away the mental toybox and grow up to face our responsibilities

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 days ago

              Who said anything about utopias? I’m talking about states that went from feudal colonial hellholes to industrial powers with raising standards of living

              China, the Soviet Union, Cuba, Allende’s Chile, Burkina Faso, Vietnam, all of them achieved an explosion of prosperity that required capitalist states to engage in war, genocide, terrorism and blockades to contain their demonstration effect

                • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  What you THINK is irrelevant, it’s an undeniable fact all those countries experienced an incredible explosion of development and raising standards of living compared to what they had before and after US intervention experienced mass death, crashes and falling life expectancy

                  Also in what universe is China and Vietnam not prosperous? They experienced the greatest decrease of poverty in human history, are you ok?

            • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              look no further than the currently socialist countries. they are going pretty well despite imperialist aggression.

              some of the past experiences are pretty nice too.

      • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Honest question: Isn’t it the same for communism? My limited understanding is that all communist leaders that have lasted any significant length of time have also trended towards fascism.

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’ve had to look it up and maybe fascism is the wrong word, I’m not exactly clear on the differences between that and totalitarian or authoritarian. But I’ve found examples to be Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and North Korea. They’ve all had highly centralised power that inevitably gets abused. Or am I wrong?

            • SFloss (they/them)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 days ago

              Before we get into a discussion, can I ask you what you think fascism is? By that I mean, given your current understanding, how would you define fascism, and what are the constituent elements of a fascist movement?

              I ask because people tend to treat words like fascism, totalitarian, and authoritarian as pure vibes without really having an understanding of what they all mean. I get that sense from your reply, so I want to hear what you think right now without any cursory research.

    • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Firstly, why would you want a worse option than the red one?
      Secondly, no, not really. You are probably going to claim ‘liberalism’, but the difference between a liberal and a fascist is a scratch.