• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think this is the biggest aspect. If you’re going to be an ai artist then digital photo manipulation is still a skill that is completely necessary.

      That’s not art, it’s image manipulation. Anyone can learn to do it and it doesn’t require creative talent, you just need to know the steps to follow to achieve x y or z in photoshop with a pre-existing image.

      The issue is that even the people with that skillset don’t really like AI that much. Content-aware fill being about as much AI as they wanna use. They can create nice stuff with collage snip and fitting multiple images together so they don’t really need much AI.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        AI should really only be a supplemental tool for actual artists (and when it’s used that way it can be amazing!) but managers don’t want to pay actual artists, they want to replace artists with barely skilled AI curators they find on Craigslist.

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s not art, it’s image manipulation. Anyone can learn to do it and it doesn’t require creative talent, you just need to know the steps to follow to achieve x y or z in photoshop with a pre-existing image.

        Case in point: I can do this. My main education into image manipulation is a bootleg copy of Paintshop Pro I had on a disk decades ago. My current process is:

        1. Google “online image editor free”
        2. Click the first link.
        3. Use the smudge tool or whatever the fuck.