Still new here and trying to figure things out. Regarding voting, I’d like to get some feedback on some thoughts I’ve had.

I get that voting D/R is pointless since Ds just seatwarm for Rs at best, and actively implement R policies at worst. They have no incentive to work for left policies, and R policies will ultimately benefit them personally.

That being said, we’re “punished” for not voting D by getting an actual insane R in office. If Rs are in control its way worse, right? or, maybe it has to get worse to get better?

So what is the dominant strategy here for National elections? My personal vote is extremely minor and unimportant so keeping that in mind, I can:

  1. not vote - Lower participation rate shows I don’t endorse the system, and if enough people don’t vote, does it mean anything?

  2. vote third party - I like this idea since, although super unlikely, it gives more pressure to D and R to moderate (lol) as neither want to lose power. Write in votes aren’t going to turn in to anything big without some serious organizing, but I don’t know if there’s ever been a serious attempt to organize a mass write in campaign? Or if there will even be a viable third party candidate in 2024?

  3. vote D - 🤮

  4. Something else?

I haven’t seen this discussed much in the short time I’ve been here so maybe I’m missing something obvious or misunderstanding something above, so would appreciate any help. Maybe the real answer is it really doesn’t matter, but would like to make the best limited choice I can

  • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You need to still vote Democrat. Even if they aren’t perfect, they’re still better than letting a Republican in. Republicans always vote.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Democrats can run on “not Republican” and simply be entitled to enough votes by that mere fact, they have no reason to ever make concessions to the left. This is affirmed by the continuous movement to the right on the part of Dems except in the language they use in their empty gestures. If a leftist spoiler fucks things up for them one election, they have reason to make concessions to take back that spoiler’s base.

      If you’re in a fight, it’s often good to use your hands to block, but if focusing only on that prevents you from striking back, all you are succeeding in is losing more slowly than otherwise.

      • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If Democrats can run on “not Republican” and simply be entitled to enough votes by that mere fact, they have no reason to ever make concessions to the left. This

        Tbf they’re not going to make concessions regardless because the Dems looove losing and hate doing anything remotely left-wing

      • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree but we need to block until we can strategize, build class consciousness, and actually organize to do something.

            • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              1 year ago

              even faster? the dems just continue the same policies. you just stop hearing about it. among latine communities, Obama was known as the deporter in chief, and he spearheaded the detention cells housing children. if anything, Trump was /less/ effective because it became a political issue libs were willing to discuss/fight back against.

    • Melonius [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see any incentive for dems to act in our best interest though. As Rs become more and more fascist they can slide right and continue to be “better than republicans.” I guess this argument is for harm reduction.

      It feels like we’re getting slow cooked fascism. Republicans are actively 1 upping each other on nazi dog whistles to try and let voters know what team they’re on while dems do absolutely nothing - was it always like this? Is “delaying” the inevitable like not seeing the doctor for a strange lump on your neck?

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dems don’t just do nothing, they actively support and give money to the most bigoted and extreme Republicans, on the basis that they think they’ll be easier to beat because more people will be threatened by them. They are fascist enablers gambling with our lives and trying to win our votes through coercion, while enacting polices that fuck us.

      • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What would “seeing the doctor” be though? Civil war? World wide war? I’m afraid that if that would happen now, the fascists would win. It seems to me that they’re capable of standing together and ready to fight. People on the left don’t have that. We splinter ourselves based on smaller differences instead of working together for small incremental progress. If republicans lose several elections in a row, they’ll eventually figure out they have to change tactics to stay relevant and maybe things can start shifting left.

        • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          organizing people to vote as a block, so you can meaningfully hold candidates’ feet to the fire. merely voting democrat because “they’re not those guys” gives them carte blanche to move further and further right, as they’ve done for 40 years since unions basically got killed off. also read state and revolution.

          • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Organizing takes time and we clearly haven’t gotten the message out well enough yet. We need to be on the defensive until there is enough support to really change things. Most people outside of forums like this don’t even understand what’s happening.

              • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No but it’s part of it. Idk what else I can do right now besides try to get people on the same page. I wish I had a better suggestion. Also, we aren’t random posters. Being on this forum means we care more than the average person. We’re more likely to actually talk about stuff like this to people in our lives.

                • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Idk what else I can do right now besides try to get people on the same page.

                  it helps to have a real and material theory of political change before trying to get people on the same page. seconding my recommendation to read state and rev, before the brainworms become terminal.

                  • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I do plan on reading more. Out of curiosity though, what do you think an average person could do right now?

    • I’m going to challenge you on the assertion that Dems are better than Republicans. How is a Dem better than a republican? There is a long list of things that the Dems have continued since Trump (and before!) that maybe they didn’t implement themselves but they could have stopped and they have chosen not to. How is a Dem better?

      • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least Dems aren’t spewing as much hate for minorities. Also, the infrastructure bill Biden implemented was actually pretty good. Republicans want to actively dismantle things like the Environmental Protection Agency. If there was another option that had a chance of winning I would vote for them. We need to figure out a way to build that. Until then, we need to at least delay the worst of it.

        • Tomboys_are_Cute [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          At least dems aren’t spewing so much hate for minorities

          “As much” is doing a lot of work there.

          infrastructure bill

          This bill? The one where they didn’t make it adjust for inflation or actually force states to comply? As cool as that bill may be it isn’t enough. Most of the projects haven’t even started and there is no guarantee that they will. Especially if they lose the house. That funding over the same time (ten years) is barely more than the military budget and that is only true if the budget stays where it was which it didn’t and won’t. Some of that funding may also be going to sodium cyanide landmines which was something I only heard about recently but has been going on since 2014, thanks Obama.

          Republicans want to dismantle the EPA

          They aren’t even in power and they’re doing it anyways.

          As it stands right now the Dems (barely, but still in hand) have congress and the executive. They have the senate by enough to ram judges through to get whatever they want from the courts but they won’t for petty reasons like decorum. Petty especially in the light of losing the right to an abortion, losing right to equal treatment for members of the LGBTQ+ community, and curbing capacities of federal agencies. You’re going to need to try harder to convince me that the Dems are better and we haven’t even gotten started on foreign policy.

          Edit: excuse my passive voice, the Dems could have passed laws to ensure that a right to an abortion or protections for the LGBTQ+ community were in place but did not. Saying they lost it is too passive, I should have said they, by conscious failure to act, stripped those rights

          • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What do we actually do about this though? I want to make things better, but how? Not voting at all doesn’t feel like sending a message. It feels like apathy. I also think it needs to happen with as little violence as possible. It needs to be someone that is voted in. We can’t let violence decide because that always seems to end with some kind of authoritarian government.

            • You could always spoil your ballot. I think it might be time to remind you where you are though because violence can and has been used to get better governments, the American civil war for one but also Cuba, Vietnam, Zimbabwe off the top of my head were all improved by violent revolution against their oppressors. The Soviet Union too for that matter among others I’d hazard you are more willing to disagree with.

            • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              We can’t let violence decide because that always seems to end with some kind of authoritarian government? What about literally every communist revolution? Cuba, China, Vietnam, Burkina Faso, the DPRK, the USSR.

              I don’t think the US at this time is ready for a revolution, violent or otherwise. But, revolutionary socialism results in better material conditions for people, and all of the above are examples