• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Orrrrrrr we can just participate in our electoral process more and be more aware of who the people we cast votes for and what they’re beholden to, but that’s not sexy enough for hexbear users.

      • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remember believing that. Then I saw the Democratic party cheat and gaslight the public into thinking theres any real democracy in their primary.

        It’s Joever, dude. Democracy is dead

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah I don’t really care about party politics so I’m not going to go further into what x or y party does, I’m just saying between engaging in a flawed system and replacing it with another system it will always be easier to engage in what already exists.

          • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s an assumption you’ve made, and its not factual. It’s a supposition of fact that you shpuld treat with appropriate skepticism

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s not an assumption it’s literally how basically everything in this universe works.

              It’s generally easier to fix something than completely redo it. Less materials, less energy expenditure, less time.

              I can use whatever analogy you want but the fact is it would be much easier to get more active in local politics and make a positive change that way than tear the whole system down and hope it doesn’t fall victim to the same power-hungry tyrants in another form.

              • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s why in nature all organism live forever instead of creating an entirely new organism to propagate their genetic line. Why waste all the resources on reproduction when you can make the original organism live forever. It’s that simple!

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I literally can’t tell if you’re serious or not because most hexbear users legit sound like this all the time.

                  There’s a reason y’all need your own instance and it’s not because you’re the enlightened ones lol

                  • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    22
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Your attempts at sounding smug just make me feel bad for you. You’re like the verbal version of those robots that can barely walk getting hit with sticks over and over again and struggling to stand back up. Go back to reddit. You’re clearly distressed by the fact that you’ve stepped outside your echo chamber.

      • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        You: “I disagree with Ogodei Khan’s’s policies and the Mongol Empire is collapsing on multiple fronts, if only we declare Kublai Khan the Great Khan at the Kurultai then the true will of the people will prevail and the empire will be cured!”

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I mean it’s that or burn it all down, and at our current rate of economic and ecological breakdown we don’t really have the time or resources to form a better structure.

          It’s much more economical for example, to repair the climate than it would be to terraform another planet. At a much smaller scale, it’s easier to fix the system than replace it.

          If we can’t even decide on basic shit like “is the earth warming at a rate that is hostile to life” or “is Taylor Swift a psyop” how are we supposed to form a new cohesive government? It’s going to be hard enough electing decent people to any structure you can think of.

          • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            at our current rate of economic and ecological breakdown we don’t really have the time or resources to form a better structure.

            Which is why we need to do a slow incrementalism by voting?

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m on board for anything better that we can realistically accomplish in the next decade that can guarantee long term prosperity for the people and also is not subject to greedy and power-hungry officials.

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Better engagement in the voting process by the voting public, for a start.

                  Unfortunately too many Americans either pay no attention to our political system, are misled enough on its operations, or are too complacent or depressed to care.

                  This is the root of the issue that has allowed the current system to be so corrupt, and regardless of governmental structure this is what needs to be solved before anything else.

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    21
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    This is the root of the issue that has allowed the current system to be so corrupt

                    The system is not corrupt. The system in the US is working 100% as intended. The root of the system is capitalism. This us what living under capital is. You can’t change anything unless you understand the problem.

                    You want to blame the least powerful people in society for not vote ing hard enough, instead of looking first at the most obvious thing we should consider - how all resources are extracted, produced, and distributed in society and what that means for evetything else

                  • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    This is what I don’t understand with people like you. The upper class holds all the cards and shits on everyone else, but supposedly it’s the lower classes fault for being shit on? Why is it their fault?

              • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                5 months ago

                Let me paraphrase what you said for you:

                “I will eat shit forever because the people forcefeeding me shit taught me that any alternative involves me eating shit AND drinking piss”

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            5 months ago

            it’s easier to fix the system than replace it.

            If we can’t even decide on basic shit like “is the earth warming at a rate that is hostile to life” how are we supposed to form a new cohesive government? It’s going to be hard enough electing decent people to any structure you can think of.

            You yourself are making our point for why liberal democracy cannot fix itself. We can’t form a “cohesive government” as you say within this system. That’s why its necessary for this system to end.

            You will never be able to elect “decent people” because you, us, the people do not have a say in who they get to vote for. This government does not exist for us, and it is not a democracy for us. And it never will be, until the power of capital is broken

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              When your way has been implemented, and the system is overthrown, and all is just and fair, how are you going to protect this revolution from the next one?

              As you said, the government doesn’t work for us. I don’t know of any structure that truly does because they all rely on those given power to use it responsibly and relinquish it eventually, which will always be subject to corruption.

              But the alternative is anarchy, and that’s not going to work either.

              • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                5 months ago

                how are you going to protect this revolution from the next one?

                There’s an entire intellectual tradition about this called Marxism-Leninism. There are successful Marxist-Leninist governments that exist right now, including the largest nation on earth. We aren’t aren’t talking about a fantasy here, there is is over a hundred years of paractice and two hundred of theory, if you’re interested in our worldview

                As you said, the government doesn’t work for us. I don’t know of any structure that truly does

                Liberal democracy does not work for us - as in the people who are not in the ruling class. That isn’t because of some immutable characteristic of all governments, it is by the design of the US government and all liberal democracies.

                They were designed by and to work to the benefit of the ruling class - capitalists. That’s why it doesn’t work for us. Thats the key element and that’s what we advocate for a change of. The only way to change things in through class struggle - and placing power in the hands of our class.

                But the alternative is anarchy, and that’s not going to work either.

                We have anarchists here and we keep the place non-sectarian. MLs would agree but not for the same reasons as you. Our disagreement is that we need the power of a state to safeguard the gains of a revolution against the global capitalist class and their state forces. Anarchists have a different view, but they understand the importance of revolutionary class struggle and disagreements aside, their theory of change is infinitely more grounded in reality than yours

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    China is the most obvious one, but Cuba, DPRK, Vietnam, the USSR did very well until it lost its conflict with the US.

                    You’re probably going to say some dumb shit like China isnt really communist, which shows you don’t know what you’re talking about, or maybe some other westoid propaganda talking point about muh authoritarianism. If that’s what you’ve got don’t bother.

                    You probably don’t consider these countries “successful” for some reason based on US propaganda. Great, we’ve all heard it and know its bullshit.

                    If you want to pretend that China is not currently the most successful nation on earth, the world’s largest democracy, and led by a Marxist Leninist party, cool. Most of the west likes to pretend that shit to. It doesn’t change reality, and no one here wants to hear about your lib fantasy world

              • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                5 months ago

                Corruption is a fundamental problem of any system of governance, and it reaches a point where the only route to defeat it is to kill the fucking cheats who set it up.

                Voting is nit going to fix a system that has intentionally broken voting to invalidate you. Only revolution can do that.

              • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                24
                ·
                5 months ago

                What’s sad is that you think you’re the one being realistic, when your theory of change is complete fantasy.

                What we’re talking about has been done and accomplished before and exists in the real world, including the largest nation on earth. What you’re talking about has never happened

                  • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    The Soviet Union lasted for decades and at the time was on the cutting edge of science, math, industry, social sciences etc and became the second leading superpower only 20 years after forming. Pretty successful if you ask me. It took the US over 100 years to do anything similar.

                    Then there’s China which is looking to be even more successful than that.