• FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t flip the lever. For the bus to kill the person in position 1, it has to kill the person in position 0.5 first. But before 0.5, it must run over 0.25. And before that, 0.125. Actually, this can be extended ad infinitum. Therefore, motion is not real, and nobody would die.

    • Arcity 🇵🇸🇺🇦@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The rate of death is constant for integers but infinite for reals, assuming a constant speed for the trolley. Much like real life I prefer humans having a longer lifespan, assuming a constant population.

      • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        the rate of deaths over time is certainly higher for reals, but you would never reach an infinite number of deaths in either case because there is not an infinite amount of time, an infinite amount of track, an infinite number of victims, or a trolley capable of operating forever. As always, the material reality places limits on us that is simply ignored for the sake of creating a thought experiment. sicko-jammin

        • Arcity 🇵🇸🇺🇦@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          It doesn’t take an infinite amount of time to travel a finite distance. Let’s say it takes 1 second to travel to the integer 1 on the reals, you would have ran over an infinite amount of people because there is an infinite amount of real numbers between 0 and 1.

          • Nacarbac [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            But you’d still need a physical, actually-Real, construction of infinite track to line up infinite people (tied down by infinite effort) with a train capable of doing infinite genocide in one second.

            I fully support efforts to construct said train, however I am doubtful as to their success.

            Furthermore, Goku could defeat Saitama.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Move the second and third together, fourth, fifth and sixth together, and so on. I that way, the trolley is killing 1 + 2 + 3… killing a total of -1/12 people.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        But that would be happening regardless of your lever pulling or not. So I suppose everyone is trapped beyond the event horizon of an infinite black hole and your decisions do not really matter.

        I guess I pull?

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    No one dies, because we can demonstrate that the track is infinitely empty by moving the person in the first position to the second position (and second to third and so on) before the trolley hits them. Then just repeat the process before the trolley reaches the second position (and so on).

    • Arcity 🇵🇸🇺🇦@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It also says nothing about scale. It could be that to get to the first integer it could take one second or until the heat death of the universe. The reals however are immune to your and my trick

  • robinn_IV [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Point out the contradictions in the concept of infinity, smirk, then turn away (if I don’t look back then neither option has fully materialized).

  • KnilAdlez [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    The solution is obvious. For the top track, Number each person that would be killed, and add a device to the front of the trolley such for each enumerated person reached, it will save them if the corresponding Turing Machine in standard enumeration halts. This has become an instance of the halting problem and thus the trolley cannot run.

    Similarly, the bottom rail is even easier. Add a device that will save the person that is represented by the real number whose value can be decoded as the set of turing machines that halt. Once again we have an instance of the halting problem and, once again, the trolley cannot run.

  • qaopjlll [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    As a compromise, I would simply construct a third track whose cardinality is strictly between that of the integers and the real numbers, and divert the train to that.

  • ta00000 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Does the trolley run them all over instantly or does it take time to do so? If it doesn’t run them over what happens to them? Do they stay tied to the tracks until they die from other causes? If so I’d probably pick the bottom one because death by trolley is probably better than death by dehydration over 2-3 days.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, the chef at my work thought sharks were a type of dinosaur and me and another guy just spent several hours trying to make him understand that while physically things are generally finite the concept of infinity is in fact real. He explained the science, I went more philosophical and explained the concept is real because we’re discussing it. You know in Sci fi when they use a machine to go into someone’s brain and it’s conceptualized as a weird hallway or whatever? This is one I’m super intrigued to do that if possible and also deeply terrified.