• JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 months ago

    “We need to think about our impact on the world and show more solidarity with the people being exploited to maintain this unsustainable system we’re benefiting from.”

    frothingfash STOP DIVIDING US!

        • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s basically just a bunch of actually based third worldist not-insane-MLM posters (and BadEmpanada in the mix because he loves to be half right and half wrong about everything to maximize pissing people) off arguing with Jacobin and DSA ppl who resent the existence of the International Committee, the only part I like

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            11 months ago

            Imagining forcing these losers to read Settlers while I stand behind them nodding their head for them and going, “mm-hmm, mm-m”.

            • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              11 months ago

              While I agree with the sentiment part of the issue is Settlers is one of the only sources for this kind of stuff they have other than Jason Unruhe. This is the Samir Amin fanclub so they are fucked. You can see how fast the arguments fall apart. They don’t want it to come down to questions about how labor has changed in the US past few decades. They dismiss the entire concept of unequal exchange outright because they sense it could have uncomfortable implications.

              I get the feeling we are in a better place to understand why they arrive at these conclusions than they are. Carl’s been at this since before Iraq II, he loves to scold people about that. I just got here, how is this possible. I’m going to Get Rich And Become God I guess.

              Just kidding we’re all decades behind this stuff why the fuck was Dialectics of Dependency only translated in 2018. I’m going insane.

              • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                11 months ago

                I think they’re extremely unsophisticated folks that just want to confirm their SocDem biases and sometimes that means a religious belief in a radical US working class. And per the screenshot, often limiting one’s understanding of liberation to the issues of proletarianizan now faced by white people in the imperial core, issues they absolutely did not and do not care about wrt anyone else. Healthcare, housing, shit wages, insecurity, etc. They saw Bernie, said, “yeah”, and then entrenched themselves and punch left rather than engaging with the basic facts of imperialism. They fetishize discourse and then act like babies during confrontation.

                Occasionally they fool themselves into thinking that they’re actually socialists just trying to approach the working class on terms that will resonate with them, and this they view criticism of SocDemery as getting in the way of progress to socialism. A ton of trots think this way and there is a lot of trot thinking at Jacobin/the DSA, conscious or unconscious. DSA was founded by an anticommunist trot and the big influx of Bernie supporters are struggling to self-radicalize in a context where struggles are framed in watered-down trot language and thinking.

                • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  💯💯💯 My only bit to add here is the figures they latch on to as examples of anti-imperialism are very telling. If you think of Unruhe or Haz or twitter posters first, you should have your “out of touch” and “too online” cards taken away for life

      • Kaplya@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        lmao never had an account there and never will.

        But this is just standard Western leftists (“Marxists” even) who are “anti-imperialist when it’s convenient to me, but when my treat supplies are threatened I’m gonna do some imperialist propaganda”

        and

        “workers in the periphery don’t have a right to fight back against imperialism without MY permission! it’s not the right time to do this, you’re only gonna make the situation worse for yourself (while I stand idly by mocking you). it’s only the right time WHEN I SAY SO (meanwhile, we are on our way to overthrow our bourgeois governments in the West in approximately… 125 years)”

  • lil_tank@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Man thinks that the core’s economy collapsing after being deprived of all the free labor from neocolonialism would not hurt any worker

    He surely knows his Marx and his Lenin by heart

    • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Man thinks that the core’s economy collapsing after being deprived of all the free labor from neocolonialism would not hurt any worker

      there’s an infographic that’s gone around here suggesting that amerikkka is so unequal that the average person here would be better off with a globally equal distribution of wealth.

      cut off full stop? sure that’s gonna cause problems. Walling the 1% and paying fairly for that formerly colonized labor would go as smoothly as the bourgeoise would let it.

      • lil_tank@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes I totally agree, this is why in itself the guy we’re dunking on isn’t absolutely wrong, in the sense that, global socialism is better for everyone. But the thing is, walling the 1% (aka revolution since the 1% have all power in the current system) is very hard, and Imperial core workers aren’t showing enough organisation, skills and… Minecraft-only tactics, for this to happen.

        So it is right to say that they are at odds with the global South proletariat in the sense that in the present, Imperial core workers fear economic crisis, and would in part support military interventions to maintain colonial power under the guise of democracy and freedom.

        If the worker’s movement in the global North turns to solidarity and revolutionary defeatism, then it’s a banger and we’ll all be better off

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Marx even wrote that the English Proletariat were a “bourgious-proletariat” and that without many “very difficult years” nothing would change in England

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Where does this whole notion that this kind of analysis, that is similar to world’s systems theory, is actually not marxist come from? Saw some people on hexbear say the same thing. There are plenty of Marxist ways to analyse the contradictions between the global north and south. The school of thought known as global historical materialism exists, and evidently is based on Marxism, with concepts such as the law of worldwide value. Samir Amin basically dedicated his whole life to studying this from a Marxist point of view. You can disagree with his analysis, but it is still clearly based off of Marx.

    • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      When you actually start quoting Samir Amin to these people, they lose their goddamned minds.

      I had someone telling me he was a Nazbol or “apologist for feudalism” (???) because he was exploring the differences between European feudalism and other tributary modes of production

      I guess we’re just supposed to post the “improve society somewhat” comic or the Monty Python bit where they find a commune of peasants living in pure filth