You must log in or register to comment.
Way too Horny but also why is Margaret Thatcher there?
That’s her American niece, Target Thatcher
Regarding top-left: I knew there were people genuinely turned on by Trump, and I have seen photos and videos of people being excited and starstruck meeting him, but this is genuinely the first time I’ve seen actual lust on someone’s face when looking at him, and I just don’t know how to feel about it but 🤢😞
lately been finding the limits of “it takes all kinds,” you know?
Bottom-left looks so much like a former roommate that I am desperately trying to remember her last name in order to confirm
Right wing older women being literally hornt up for Trump is an actual phenomenon. Right wingers very very much fall for what Trump says he is and how Trump says he is. Construct, in your mind, a man who fits Trump’s deranged conception of himself. What a stone cold fucking character right? What a rockstar.
“Conservative singles ready to mingle just 1 mile from you!”
Thanks, I hate it
“EAT MY BABY! EAT MY BABY PRESIDENT TRUMP!”
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Meat Canyon characters irl
Unimaginable levels of thirst
Left to right: Donna, Barbara, Cheryl, Betty, Joan, Linda, Linda
And the really weird thing is that look hasn’t changed dramatically since, idk, the 80s? the 70s?
It’s become a more boring version of itself
Why do they all look like him?
I am called to this poem by
Shel SilversteinRoald Dahl (both of whom are, I presume, lovely people with similar stylesShel Silverstein’s unlovely, antisemitic contemporary)
Roald Dahl, actually
Fixed, sorry and thank you
Roald Dahl, and he was very much not a lovely person. Dude was really really antisemitic as a start.
Fixed and thank you
They look like cosplay versions of themselves.
That blonde woman on the top right is looking a bit sinister
you shouldn’t call brunettes sinister blondes
She’s looking like she both thinks Trump is a snacc and a snack at the same time.
I think it’s a photo composite though, so there’s probably been a bit of photoshop work done on them, which is why they all kind of look “off.”
What’s off? The lighting is a little weird, but I zoomed way the fuck in and looked closely at faces and hair and where hair overlaps clothes etc, and it all looks like a photograph to me. What am I missing?
I think they might’ve been touched up a little in photoshop, moved around to better fit in the frame and maybe had some filters put on their faces or something, their faces seem a bit too smooth, like all the creases and wrinkles were removed using a blur tool or something.
Oh I see it now. I guess I had assumed that was the result of weird/bad makeup in the weird/bad light because it wasn’t like that on every face - the lady by his elbow has it really bad, but the one behind her left shoulder doesn’t have it at all, but then the one behind that ones right shoulder does kinda have it - but maybe that’s good evidence for it being a composite.
It could be that, but yeah, they seem bunched up a bit weird, it could just be weird lighting, but I think they’ve been moved around a bit to fit in the frame.
Thank you for helping me see it!
as far as I know it’s an untampered Getty Images newswire photo by Chip Somodevilla
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14061660/women-march-washington-vote-trump
This is truly one of the most iconic photographs of the last century. I hate it so much and I can’t look away
Seriously thought it was Biden with his back to the camera at first. Could just as easily be a Biden crowd.
Only once I read your comment did I do a double take and saw it wasn’t him
Are these the DSA KKKarens I keep hearing about?
they’re not, but they look AI generated
No matter how many times I look it never gets old
The perfect photo
WOMENSIMPS
FOR
TRUMP
Obligatory he’s not going to fuck you, Mabel!
I feel like every single one of them is a disgraced subject of a 2008 reality show focused on how rich they are
