Sorry if this is a stupid question but fortunately I’m uneducated.

You have “Marxist economists” like Richard Wolff and Michael Hudson, and you have “non-Marxist leftists” like Noam Chomsky and Carl Oglesby. What do Marxist and non-Marxist mean in this context? Is it like, Marxists think that everything Marx thought was correct and non-Marxists think everything he thought was wrong? Or is it like a >50% thing, if you think Marx was right more than half the time you’re a Marxist and if not then you’re a non-Marxist?

This is probably the wrong community to ask but how is it possible to be a non-Marxist (assuming that means you think Marx was wrong about everything) when fictitious capital and a reserve army of labor are staring you in the face?

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    9 天前

    Generally, a Marxist is one that places Marxist analysis above all other economic interpretations and schools of thought. Marx was wrong about a few things, but in the grand scheme of things is overwhelmingly correct. The Marxists that think Marx was 100% correct are actually extremely few in number, because things like the way imperialism evolved came after Marx could even observe them, and his work was unfinished. He’s closer to 99% correct.

    Plus, he got some math wrong sometimes like in volume 2 of Capital, and Engels had to correct him on it. Marx never finalized it though so he gets a pass on that IMO, and it was very uncommon for him to get arithmetic wrong.

    Chomsky and the like explicilty reject Marx. They disagree with the law of value, dialectical and historical materialism, etc. Even if they agree with ideas like surplus value extraction, rejecting the law of value, dialectical and historical materialism, etc. is what makes them non-Marxist.