• ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love that the article makes no mention of the US sending ships through Chinese territorial waters all the fucking time, but talks about this normal and legal action China and Russia took as “unprecedented”

    • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except those waters aren’t Chinese territory, which is the entire point of doing freedom of navigation cruises…to remind them of that fact

      The recent China-Russia operation was also in international waters, and you’ll notice it’s only a handful of senators making a stink about it to get some publicity, the military was pretty clear that it wasn’t a problem. They just shadow it like they always do.

      • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        11 months ago

        After the Gulf of Tonkin fraud, why should American warships be allowed anywhere outside American waters

        • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, they don’t have to be allowed in international waters, you just need to get all the planet’s seafaring countries to dedicate all of their naval resources to a blockade of the US.

          The cheaper option is to realize that the USN is generally pretty serious about enforcing freedom of navigation in a way essentially noone else is able to, which is a net positive for the planet. Even when you factor in some of the shady activities and plain old fuckups that they are occasionally involved in.

          Frankly I’d be thrilled if China would actually act like the modern global power they clearly want to become, rather than joining Russia in some 1800s imperial LARPing vs the rest of the world.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            This is just peak morshupls It’s different when we do it cope

            enforcing freedom of navigation in a way essentially noone else is able to, which is a net positive for the planet

            The planet: us-foreign-policy

            1800s larping

            Who’s got the biggest system of prison slavery in world history, again?

            Who’s bringing back child labor?

            • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I am mostly sure the naval blockade of Cuba ended well before I was born, so there is zero freedom of navigation issue happening currently.

              The embargo only applies to US companies, we aren’t stopping other countries from continuing to trade witch Cuba.

              I mean, it’s stupid as hell, and will never work, but that’s about the extent of it.

              • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                33
                ·
                11 months ago

                The trade embargo, not the naval blockade. The trade embargo that the UN General Assembly has called illegal multiple times. Like how ships docking into US ports can’t trade with Cuba, or businesses trading with Cuba have to go through massive paperwork hoops to prove that they have zero American shareholders. Or like how Cuba has to import basic medical supplies from the other end of the world.

              • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                The embargo has been active since 1960 and has never ended, I’m not sure where you got the idea that it had stopped. And yeah, while it doesn’t directly prevent anyone else from trading with Cuba, it does prohibit anyone who trades with Cuba (or even just enters a Cuban port for maintenance) from trading with the US for the next 180 days, and considering the US is such a major trading partner, that heavily disincentivizes other nations from trading with them, don’t you think?

                Either way it’s petty as hell and absolutely still happening, it infringes on Cuba’s right to self determination, and is not what I would call “generally pretty serious about enforcing freedom of navigation” by any stretch of the imagination.

                • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Its amusing how this thread went from the legitimacy of various naval exercises and then shifted to trade policy when that didn’t pan out, which is an entirely different animal, its more of an elephant than a zebra. (It ain’t black and white, definitely grey.)

                  Trying to get me to defend the Cuba trade embargo ain’t gonna happen, because it really is pointless and harmful. But I like how its conveniently ignored that the rest of the world could easily more than cover what the US refuses to send to Cuba. The US Navy wouldn’t stop them from doing so, because the blockade ended decades ago.

                  But oddly enough, that doesn’t happen. I wonder why not? Because, oh no, what would the world do without more of those sweet, sweet dollars??? Yeah, never mind the ethics, one can’t forgo profits from trade with the US, so let’s go fuck the Cubans right along with the Americans, and keep our citizens fat and happy with a steady supply of Levis, Big Macs, and movies. But, you know, lets continue paying lip service to how bad it is while making money hand over fist in complicity.

                  A truly astounding amount of hypocrisy. The US has plenty of hypocrisy to go around too, but at least I am not going to try to defend it.

              • Teekeeus [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                11 months ago

                From the guardian, a liberal mainstream publication

                https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/03/cuba-us-embargo-must-end

                In short, the US embargo impacts every aspect of life on the island – and that is the precisely the point. Sixty years ago on this day, President John F Kennedy introduced Proclamation 3447, Embargo on All Trade with Cuba, designed to isolate Cuba and stop the spread of so-called Sino-Soviet Communism “Every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba,” the assistant secretary of state, Lester D Mallory, wrote in an April 1960 memo. The goal of the Kennedy administration was clear: “To bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.”

                Today, Joe Biden lives up to Kennedy’s legacy and the ambitions of his Cuban embargo. Not only has the president refused to undo the extraordinary sanctions imposed by the Trump administration, reneging on his campaign promise to restore diplomatic relations and leaving Cuba on the list of “state sponsors of terrorism”. He has also doubled down on the embargo, tightening restrictions and imposing a host of new sanctions against the Cuban government.

                Both the Biden administration and its Republican opposition claim that these measures are targeted at the regime, rather than the Cuban people. But the evidence to the contrary is not only anecdotal. The UN estimates that the embargo has cost Cuba over $130bn in damages – costs that are compounded by the penalties imposed by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Cuba’s allies and investors. Between April 2019 and March 2020 alone, OFAC penalties amounted to over $2.4bn, targeting banks, insurance firms, energy companies and travel agencies alike.

                The effect of the embargo is therefore both local and global: it cripples the Cuban economy and undermines the multilateral system that the US claims to lead.

          • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            11 months ago

            love to enforce freedom of navigation by seizing Iranian/Venezuelan oil tankers, enforcing embargoes on Cuba and.the DPRK.

            also love to wave around the word imperialism to describe state enemies when the us has fit that definition for the last 100 years.

          • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            11 months ago

            Frankly I’d be thrilled if China would actually act like the modern global power they clearly want to become, rather than joining Russia in some 1800s imperial LARPing vs the rest of the world.

            The rest of the world is at worse neutral to at least one of the two. Oh! I see, you don’t actually mean the entire world just the only countries you think matter us-foreign-policy

  • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good thing the US doesn’t do massive exercise with multiple counties, planning potential attacks on enemy countries. Cuz that would be really terrifying for those places with memories of Amerikan mass murder.

    • goatmeal [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah people really dunno how hawkish South Korea Park Admin was with lots of joint naval exercises with the US. This provoked Kim’s nuke tests. Thankfully SK elected Moon who had real summits with Kim. Unlike Trump who threatened him before not negotiating in good faith.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      Doing a friendly little joint exercise to establish the safety and security of international merchant vessels.

      Only someone who hated freedom would be against that

  • philomory@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know it’s utterly besides the point, but I am in love with that shitty map graphic in the article. It’s just so funny to me for some reason I can’t articulate.

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    American regime uses authoritarian intimidation tactics on ships exercising their freedom of navigation rights guaranteed by international law.

    • goatmeal [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      We don’t even share in their plunder!! People here think we do sometimes. Like if we didn’t have Nestlé Chocoslaves and Coffee slaves the price of these goods would go up… Libertarians believe these workers aren’t slaves. Liberals are worse because they shrug it off.

  • aby [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    but sky shade price watch straight test quiet late metal cake frequent sense I system coal move self reason knee umbrella because liquid blood food rest test chemical star boat floor look mother say off green light farm library rest east ink lock wave match summer view possible moon opinion