InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agoEverybody understands that answering an unsolicited phone call is like licking a public toilet. Who is answering the phone? What a crazy stat about the number of calls.hexbear.netimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1110arrow-down1imageEverybody understands that answering an unsolicited phone call is like licking a public toilet. Who is answering the phone? What a crazy stat about the number of calls.hexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-27 months agoThe quoted text says 127,000 calls to 93,000 voters. That’s a 73% hit rate!
minus-squareVILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-27 months agoNo, they only got 1,059 responses, a hit rate of 1.1%. There were 93,000 people that they called, some of whom were phoned more than once.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months ago… so I somehow only read the part after the […] and totally missed that 🫠
minus-squarefox [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoThey spoke with about a thousand people, which means of those 93,000 some were double or triple calls.
The quoted text says 127,000 calls to 93,000 voters. That’s a 73% hit rate!
No, they only got 1,059 responses, a hit rate of 1.1%. There were 93,000 people that they called, some of whom were phoned more than once.
… so I somehow only read the part after the […] and totally missed that 🫠
They spoke with about a thousand people, which means of those 93,000 some were double or triple calls.