“This source on the book is bad because it’s biased and not from the authors”
Are the authors unbiased, or are we to say that the only permissible bias is that of the author? I genuinely think those are the only two readings and both are completely stupid.
He didn’t even read the book lmao
deleted by creator
Third party journalists critiques: Biased
Interview with racist author of racist book saying “I swear it’s not racist”: Not Biased
Watching a video of Steven Crowder saying the bell curve isn’t racist: not biased
Their entire worldview begins with the premise that they are le rational very smart logic boy
Oh god these are the type of people who come to Hexbear and post
To these fascists, “unbiased” means “agrees with me”
you are nitpicking and biased therefore I win bye bye
Liberals love nothing more than to claim a win on a technicality, even if that technicality is literally just bullshit they just made up themselves.
you are technically correct
The best kind of correct
Up-bears to the left!!
“This source on the book is bad because it’s biased and not from the authors”
Are the authors unbiased, or are we to say that the only permissible bias is that of the author? I genuinely think those are the only two readings and both are completely stupid.
Why the fuck would you admit you didn’t read it after defending its contents?? Is it a fetish for humiliation?