• zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why? Being an ‘American’ automatically makes their critique irrelevant?

    It makes it imperialist intrigue. His critiques are made of ignorance and he knows nothing about the history, context and conditions of the nation he criticizes. A revolutionary is to avoid imperialist intrigue and attacking the enemy of their current state, as that is chauvinism. He exists as part of the grand western tradition of social chauvinism and does not attempt to break from it.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Very good point, I wasn’t viewing the critique from a revolutionary/conflict lens, but more abstractly or theoretically. In the current climate I would argue there are many more worthwhile critiques to be made than those that are against Marxist states, so I do agree that it serves the motives of imperialists even if the critique might be accurate.

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Public political figures such as owners and editors of supposedly socialist publications are also held to a different standard in their official media than a random socialist making Marxist critiques as well. He’s not just some leftist on the internet, he wants to sell himself as a major commentator and thought leader. That means he has a very strict duty to avoid imperialist intrigue and he fails at it