God help them. The slaughter to come is probably beyond our imagining

        • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          happy there had finally been any kind of response to the regular killings of Palestinian civilians

          What is there to be happy about? When this is over we’ll return to the regular scheduled sporadic killing of Palestinian civilians, but in the meantime we’re going to be inundated in a wholesale slaughter of Palestinian civilians, with some Israeli citizens thrown in as well. That’s the material consequences of the current uprising, which are universally bad.

            • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              natives shouldn’t fight against their oppressors, because their opressors will opress them

              I didn’t say anything remotely like that. If you care about actually ending the oppresion, nominally your strategic goals should be ending that oppression, not doomed violence for it’s own sake. We even have a word for this on the left: ‘adventurism’. The Viet Minh opposition to the French may have been violent, but it wasn’t a fruitless and doomed affair, and their leadership went to incredible lengths to make sure their attacks where strategically fruitful.

              what are do you people want Palestine to do?

              Uhh not this, because it won’t achieve any of their political aims and is just going to get a bunch of civilians killed. I don’t need to posit a better idea to point out how much of a shit-sandwich that this is going to be for the Palestinians and that leftists shouldn’t be treating it like their team scoring a goal in a football match.

              On the flip side, can you point to why this is a good thing to be happy about from a material perspective, and not a vibes based ‘psychological’ victory?

              • JohnBrownsBussy2 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                34
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Honestly, I think that you’re wrong on the possibility of material victory. This offensive has shown the world that Palestinian resistance is not dead and that they can stand up to deal a devastating blow. If they can disrupt Israel’s attempts to re-align various Arab nations, and if the hostages and threat of Hezbollah intervention can pre-empt a ground invasion in Gaza, then the resistance could make significant material concessions/gains. Depending on how the next few days go, then I think there’s a chance of reforging the broader pro-Palestinian coalition amongst the various countries of the Middle East, especially in light of the Saudi-Iran rapprochement. If changing the geopolitical alignment into one that’s much more favorable to the survival of the Palestinian people isn’t a material gain, than I don’t know what is.

                There was clearly an incredible degree of effort and coordination to pull off an operation of this scale without alerting the Israeli security apparatus. I don’t think this operation is particularly irrational or feckless. It’s a gamble, but the alternative to action is a slow death.

                • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  devastating blow

                  They haven’t done that though. They’ve shown they’re capable of bloodying Israel’s nose. They’ve killed scores and taken a base, but Israel’s ability to wage a war against them has not been reduced one iota. This isn’t some distant colony half a world away were a big psychological victory is enough to cause a pull-back. They’re right on the border, and are treated as an imminent security threat by Israel, so in order to prevent them from waving war you have to actually reduce their ability to, not just their desire.

                  if the hostages and threat of Hezbollah intervention can pre-empt a ground invasion in Gaza,

                  Which, if you know anything about Israeli governments, especially right wing ones, you know has a 0% chance of being effective. They’ve killed their own men before to avoid this. A ground invasion is absolutely coming.

                  • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    22
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The Easter Uprising ended up with pretty much everyone dead. There was no military victory. The Brits bombed out the area and executed everyone they could. But it didn’t stop with the Easter Uprising, it shifted the narrative and galvanized more of the population. It made them feel like they actually had chance again. I’d say they were on the border of the British Empire still quite at its peak as well. Modern military tech might have changed but the psychological effects can’t be written off whole cloth a day into what’s actually happening.

                  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    18
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They haven’t done that though. They’ve shown they’re capable of bloodying Israel’s nose. They’ve killed scores and taken a base, but Israel’s ability to wage a war against them has not been reduced one iota. This isn’t some distant colony half a world away were a big psychological victory is enough to cause a pull-back. They’re right on the border, and are treated as an imminent security threat by Israel, so in order to prevent them from waving war you have to actually reduce their ability to, not just their desire.

                    No, it’s more than that. They’re demonstrating that Israel is weaker than ever, both militarily and domestically. Just compare 2021 and right now. In 2021, the iron dome was partially effective as a countermeasure against rockets (although the fact that it was only partially effective and not have a “95% interception rate” was itself a victory). But now, the iron dome is completely out of the picture, mostly misfiring and being useless since the Palestinians are no longer relying exclusively on rockets. In 2021, there wasn’t much ground troops from the Palestinians while now, they are merking Israeli soldiers at military bases and commandeering Israeli tanks. At the geopolitical front, Israel’s allies are weaker than before while the Palestinians’ allies are stronger than before. The French is getting chased out of the Sahel and the much-anticipated counteroffensive in Ukraine turned out to be a dud. Now is the time to strike. In terms of weapons, I didn’t remember much drone use by the Palestinians in 2021, but now drones are everywhere, blowing up tanks and merking Israeli soldiers. Israeli domestic politics is more of a clusterfuck right now than in 2021. There will of course be a rallying behind the flag, but that domestic unity will complete crumble when hostilities end, which will further weaken Israel and set the stage for another Palestinian offensive. Israeli propaganda game is also weaker compared with 2021, mostly because they got caught off guard and 2021 punctured much of their PR.

                    There’s a qualitative leap between what we saw in 2021 and what we’re seeing in 2023. Even the Israeli response was harsher in 2021 with more bombed buildings, bombed hospitals, and bombed cemeteries within the same time frame than right now. Why? Because Israel is weaker in 2023 than 2021.

            • Staines [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I was a civilian benefiting from and supporting an apartheid regime, it would be very tragic for the brutal savages we keep locked up in a city sized cage to escape and kill me.

    • Quick question though, if Israel’s gov’t was gone and replaced, would it be better to name it “Palestine” or “Israel-Palestine” to be more inclusive, like how Rhodesia was once temporarily “Zimbabwe-Rhodesia”… ?

    • I can only come to the same conclusion. Its one thing to attack a military checkpoint directly on the border with your territory, heck it’s even another thing to occupy the territory of your oppressors, but I don’t see how anyone can excuse going out of your way to target random civilians in their homes or to shoot at any moving human you can see.

      • CarmineCatboy [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its one thing to attack a military checkpoint directly on the border with your territory

        The palestinians do not have territory. They do not have borders to defend nor any standing as human beings before the regime in Tel Aviv. They live in open air concentration camps under permanent blockade of water, supplies and electricty. It’s not surprising that you enjoy misrepresenting the conflict given that your only recourse so far has been a knee jerk reaction to anyone who even so much smells as pro palestinian.