Anime avatars are often a coin toss between (potential) comrade and chud, so it may be fun and maybe helpful to think about and share those in the place of that old hentai-free bellwether for chuddery.

Mine is anyone with “.eth” as a suffix in their online name. I have yet to see a single person that does that that isn’t a chud. cryptocurrency

It may even be cheating, but seeing an actual cryptofascist cartoon “original NFT do not steal” is a pretty reliable red flag too. monke-beepboop

EDIT: Oh yeah, I almost forgot. blue-check farquaad-point

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s still a thing.

      Somewhat related is the "furry avatar doing a Dreamworks face or otherwise trying too hard to look jaded and intellectual.* last-sight

    • batsforpeace [any, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      yeah I think marble or bronze busts in the room are a pretty good clue

      also if they have large sections of non-fiction leather bound books that could be a tip off, see the top 10 bestsellers here for example

        • batsforpeace [any, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          yeah I mean I wouldn’t build a ‘Chud-o-Meter 3000’ around this because some people are collectors or want to be well rounded, but companies that print these usually choose from the western canon, so no radical stuff allowed, I have a few general history books bound in that classic style but nothing left-leaning except for the Eric Hobsbawm Modern History series.

          I’m more thinking of people who show them off in the background as part of their online persona like some right wing commentators

        • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s more of an ”I’ve never read a book that wasn’t one of the required ones in school, but want to appear smart” thing. Which is admittedly at the very least chud adjacent.

          melon-musk’s list of recommended books was all shit like that and Orwell. At least Steve Jobs’ list showed he’d maybe read a book that wasn’t one of the Anglo ”every schoolchild has read this” ones.

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            I’ve found that to be more common with run-of-the-mill libs, where they also always mix up fiction with non-fiction. Chuds just won’t read or id they do read it’s like they try to read Julius Caesar’s auto-biograohy uncritically.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Hey now, the Art of War is great and everyone should read it. Most people have never really sat down and thunk about the whens whys and hows of getting 50,000 of your buddies together to slaughter those shitass wankers in Wu and it shows.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          It’s incredibly funny to me that the Art of War does contain some very useful insights, especially for the time, but everyone seems to be hell bent on repeating the most basic bitch conclusions from that text like they’re an ancient chinese secret.

          The importance of logistics, flexibility, mobility, and so forth are things organizations and militaries fuck up to this day but all anyone wants to talk about is how winning without fighting is the best. Wow, getting what I want without being punched in the face is better than getting what I want but also being punched in the face? Ground breaking.

        • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          bro using spies will get you intel 🤯

          bro it’s easier to win if you have the high ground 🤯

          bro cavalry moves faster than infantry 🤯

          bro don’t let your supply lines get cut off 🤯

          bro you’ll lose fewer resources if you don’t fight 🤯

          bro it’s expensive to keep people in the field 🤯