I can be upset by more than one thing at a time, believe it or not. If I saw one man shoot a hospital and another trip a child and laugh at him, I would be upset by both.
Calling thousands of completely normal people “vultures enjoying death” who “are not helping society” and who “should be ashamed of themselves” for consuming media you don’t personally approve of is peak internet discourse but :honk-enraged: away I guess
Don’t think someone who 1. Accused me of a position/priority list I didn’t have from a single comment 2. Implied I didn’t care enough about a big problem because I voiced an opinion about another problem and 3. Switched arguments mid-roll can really accuse anyone else of being peak internet discourse. All that aside, what’s even your point here? It’s not something i just don’t like or approve of, I’ve stated pretty clearly it’s actively harmful. Are you going to argue that they aren’t deriving pleasure from other people’s pain and suffering, or that this is somehow helping society?
*also lmao the poster who was just summarily labeling people moral reprobates for the crime of listening to the wrong genre of podcasts is now offended by someone taking an “aggressive tone.” Just the biggest karen energy
capitalist exploitation and ecocide of the whole planet: :comfy:
someone somewhere is listening to a true crime podcast: :honk-enraged:
I can be upset by more than one thing at a time, believe it or not. If I saw one man shoot a hospital and another trip a child and laugh at him, I would be upset by both.
Calling thousands of completely normal people “vultures enjoying death” who “are not helping society” and who “should be ashamed of themselves” for consuming media you don’t personally approve of is peak internet discourse but :honk-enraged: away I guess
Don’t think someone who 1. Accused me of a position/priority list I didn’t have from a single comment 2. Implied I didn’t care enough about a big problem because I voiced an opinion about another problem and 3. Switched arguments mid-roll can really accuse anyone else of being peak internet discourse. All that aside, what’s even your point here? It’s not something i just don’t like or approve of, I’ve stated pretty clearly it’s actively harmful. Are you going to argue that they aren’t deriving pleasure from other people’s pain and suffering, or that this is somehow helping society?
:honk-enraged:
dang excellent point. You took an aggressive tone and have yet to correct me on what part of my thinking is wrong, I’m clearly being irrational.
:honk-enraged: Debaaaaaate meeeeee
*also lmao the poster who was just summarily labeling people moral reprobates for the crime of listening to the wrong genre of podcasts is now offended by someone taking an “aggressive tone.” Just the biggest karen energy
tell me what I’m getting wrong, what is it you think I’m missing?