It depends on what the publishers publish for. If it’s money then Peertube is probably not attractive.

Most of everyone else would agree that it is a lack of political will.

There are ads on the radio in Perth that are spruiking how essential methane is to industry. What’s most annoying is no mention of the devastating effects on the climate crisis. Greenwashing at its finest.

Here I am, surprised that the US has troops in Chad.

I suppose that once you have laws that allow blocking one type of site then other sites will be pretty easy to be added. A precedent sort of thing. Done once then others will follow.

Pretty amazing that piracy is such a hot topic such that freedoms can be curtailed but everyone’s right to an AR15 must be protected.

Sounds like more shooting between Chinese and Indian soldiers with little to show for it.

Because Russia is so good at it and effectively does it all the time as well as it being doctrine.

Given that Russian doctrine is all about disinformation and deflection, is he actually worth listening to until there is something on the table?

Never watched this Carlson fool but it seems that others do to their detriment. If you are so desperate for ratings that you need to give a platform to Putin, your life must be in tatters.

Depends on where you are and which map you use.

They have always had a poor relationship with China over border issues even during the Vietnam war. They probably just make it clear that the Chinese don’t intimidate them.

America is now out of their space and is a trading partner whereas they share a border with China and have South China Sea disputes. China and America are rivals so it makes some sort of sense for the Vietnamese to pick the one not too close to annoy the other.

If the result of voting for Bernie was Trump then I think a lot of people would regret voting for him. As the result wasn’t Trump last time, then we have the dodged bullet syndrome where voting for Bernie doesn’t matter as no harm done.

It’s plausible as the economics of Starlink seem to be very shaky.

The perils of autocorrect and less diligence in checking the result.

Isn’t it amazing that a psychopath who goes around fermenting war and terrorising his people now wants to turn women into baby factories. Sounds like Republicans.

Don’t forget his lawyers.

As I recall it, the system used cameras or maybe radar to detect the cars some distance away so it had time to optimise the lights. The Google system seems to be based on historical data which probably the quickest way to improve using the current technology. My observation is that most traffic lights are set and forget so there are probably huge improvements possible.

As google data is based on mobile phones, they probably do have data on pedestrians as well as cars which could be promising.

To really fix things there will need to be new technology to allow realtime adjustments which introduces the opportunity to detect bikes and pedestrians.

There was research on this at least 10 years ago where approaching traffic was detected and the lights were dynamically adjusted to improve traffic flow. This is the first time I’ve heard of this since.

Sadly, no one is considering optimising pedestrian traffic flows as they tend to have to wait at beg lights for increasing amounts of time. If we want liveable cities then we need to consider walking as a priority.