7bicycles [he/him]

  • 85 Posts
  • 1.52K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 8th, 2022

help-circle

  • If I can get a sympathetic response from my team member in charge of tech integration in classrooms, then clearly others are thinking this way too. I may have just convinced myself over time that I was the only one in the room thinking this way.

    Yeah but don’t delude yourself here. It is statistically unlikely you reach a critical mass here for it to matter. You seem to care about your job, which is good and all, I wouldn’t bet on everybody else there doing that. Most people are in it for the paycheque and they use the path of least resistance, never realizing they could have an impact if they cared - and I do not mean this as an insult. It’s a job. You do this shit for ~8 hours and go home to live your actual life. You seem to see this differently, which is good, but it’s a walk on the knifes edge.

    There isn’t going to be the marxist revolt at your job because you’re the most convincing communist ever, not how it works. Maybe you can salt the earth, sure, but the scenario you described here is too close and too much right now for that to happen. That’s more of a 5 year plan - do keep going at it. And even then just by design your institution will not be the holdout from the superstructure.

    Sorry if that’s a bit depressing, but you gotta grapple with reality. Now’s the time to lib out, honestly. Incremental change and all that. Change the System from inside. Do what you can, but don’t overplay your hand here. Saving 5% of people from the AI brainrot that kills your critical thinking instantly, in this scenario, still beats saving none. Your best option is to machiavelli this shit. You’re free to yearn, advocate or fight for a better future at your job and outside of it, but it takes time that you do not have currently. Now is the time to play politics as inscribed by your institution and make the most out of it. Sound a few dogwhistles along the way. You said you’re not a director, whatever bad shit happens isn’t your fault. Make the difference you can, but pick your battles. Save 5% of people and still be able to sleep at night.









  • The issue that I’m struggling with is that I can identify these issues, see these systemic problems, chart a path toward the larger problem it is going to create down the line, yet I can’t articulate how to mitigate these issues at our level, or struggle to identify appropriate next steps.

    You’re not going to solve systemic issues that plague society as the educational IT Professional. It’s the old tale, as a a marxist you gotta have two opinions on everything, one is how to fix it, the other is how to deal with it in the now. How can you advocate for harm reduction here? What’s possible for you to do to make it less bad?

    If I had to take a stab at it from your description, I’d argue that not letting students use AI, ever, will not work out, not even in the students favour - as you said. Can you propose maybe that the testing and such is diversified? Tasks or projects with clear allowance for AI, but other tasks - mostly monitored in classrooms I’d guess - that ban AI? Contextualize the Google part as a part of the world, but not the only future, show alternatives? I don’t think this’ll save more than 5% of people, really, but at least it saves 5% and lets you sleep at night





  • I don’t think this is a specifically IT-Problem, this is an HR-Problem. In an organization of any given size they’re not gonna be able to comprehend the details of whatever they’re recruiting at all. How would they?

    But at the same time, HR is the cops of the corporate world, so it givess you major brainworms. You figure you’re qualified to recruit anybody, I mean, you’re HR! We’re fucking HR, all we do to pick candidates is at best do astrology but it is so, so important and since we’re job-cops we have the red telephone to the CEO. Sure, you might think “guy who worked with a ticketing system that’s 2% off what we use” would be a great fit, but luckily we here in HR are there to state that since this isn’t 100% what we’re looking for, no. Also we’ve given a report to the CEO that among the unwashed masses upon which we spit, there isn’t a single qualified applicant as based on matching keywords in their resume. Sorry, boss, maybe drum up the “work shy” rhetoric some more? We love you and that will help us a lot, there’s just too many bad people, dangit!

    In the sense of it’s weird that the Marxists are the only people left concerned with how an organization works, if you are a CEO and trust your HR you have failed at your job. These are still just your employees, they don’t give a fuck. Left to their own devices they will implement the worst application progress known to man, because it means they can just tell you the aforementioned lies. You should treat them as a hostile entity to your enterprise, but they do also fire people, so they get special privilege.




  • but at present they don’t have automated systems that quickly identify and find every instance of something like this.

    My point is mostly they don’t have to do the impossible and single out one guy who routes his laptop via third country to the DRPK, my point is that you either find the guy going on cannonball runs all his life or alternatively the aforementioned sheboygan hotspot of remote worker connections to tech companies all coming from hostile countries




  • Either the DPRK has a really dedicated network of laptop spies that go otherwise unnoticed by the panopticon somehow and spend all their time as cross-continental drifters or there’s like 20 VPN tunnels of employees all working for tech companies that ends up in the greater sheboygan area as defined by what one person could reasonably do in a week and neither of those feel realistic honestly