• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thank you for explaining this.

      Well folks, let’s go home. natural_motions has it all figured out.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Well, the mod kind of illustrates why anarchism is unviable by using their power in the heirarchy here to silence dissent.

        Even with the small sphere of influence here in their own community, anarchists cannot run things without resorting to heirarchy as a literal first option.

        A good object lesson, as in the real world this would be using a prison or a firing squad or whatever.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          freedom of association applies here. “Spoiler: It doesn’t” does not constitute a nuanced discussion anyway.

          maybe you can talk to dessalines or nutomic or wait for the plugin system for collective moderation.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Even the concept of “country” is not applicable. Anarchists don’t believe in borders.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Lmfao, tell us you know nothing about anarchism without saying you know nothing about anarchism

          Hint: one of the main points of anarchy is that there is no “country”. How about trying to learn, instead of so confidently asserting your ignorance? (lol, as if)

          E: also, not that I expect that you care, but having now watched the full video - the last segment (3 minutes that you can easily skip to) answers your question perfectly.

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Lol, perfect confirmation of my point… 😂

              get me to care less

              that would only be possible if you gave any shits in the first place, which you clearly didn’t, you’re here to troll, not learn, so as much as it would be convenient to shift the blame, your ignorance is all on you. At least own it. (again - as if, lmfao)

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                7 months ago

                Every time an anarchist is questioned, they either struggle or demand someone read something.

                So yeah a point was proven here

                • jorp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Every time you’re given an opportunity to educate yourself, you seem to reject it. Is that a problem with anarchists or with you?

                  Frankly I don’t think anyone here cares what you think, you’re only hurting yourself with your willful ignorance.

                  Turns out reading is an important way to learn.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Like this sub where the person in authority unilaterally deletes dissent immediately? Or are your principles something you only apply later, after all the undesirables are “taken care of”?