[P]erhaps the voters are sensible and the economists are obtuse. And perhaps the indicators on which economists rely no longer mean what economists suppose them to mean.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pandemic pressure would naturally produce a historic rise in wages for low-income workers? Can you explain a little more?

    A couple of years in the positive direction isn’t fixing it.

    So we’re moving the goalposts from “things are getting worse” to “okay things are getting better in recently-unprecedented ways, but that’s not important right now”?

    I mean, I do agree with you that a couple of years of good progress isn’t going to mean issues with the American economy are “fixed,” but I didn’t think that’s what we were talking about.

    • Banzai51@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m saying the last couple of years is an illusion. As soon as things get back to normal economically, the inequity will continue its march.

      And yes, mid to post pandemic saw rising wages. 1 million+ died, 3.5-4 million retired. When the restrictions loosened up, what was the big problem? “No one wants to work!!!” Because a lot of people took those relief checks and retrained themselves. When the low wage jobs could go back to normal, most of those former low wage workers had already found other, higher paying jobs. Eventually even the most stubborn restaurants or retail jobs raised wages to compete. Remember everyone complaining that low skilled McDonald’s workers making $15/hr? Or did you conveniently forget the last 4 years to argue with an idiot on the internet?

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m saying the last couple of years is an illusion. As soon as things get back to normal economically, the inequity will continue its march.

        And yes, mid to post pandemic saw rising wages. 1 million+ died, 3.5-4 million retired. When the restrictions loosened up, what was the big problem? “No one wants to work!!!” Because a lot of people took those relief checks and retrained themselves.

        So… things will get back to inequality again, as soon as all those people un-retrain themselves, un-retire, and come back to life?

        I’m mean, I’m partly kidding; I actually do think people straight-up dying or becoming disabled had a big unrecognized impact in wage growth, yes. But also, supply chain inflation and companies that went bust during the pandemic and didn’t come back, put some weight on the scale on the other side.

        Biden’s policies created 700,000 new manufacturing jobs so far. We raised corporate taxes significantly and then put hundreds of billions of dollars back into domestic industry in a way that was specifically designed to create jobs. It would be weird if the impact of that was 0.

        Let me ask this – if your assertion is that wages rising is just a natural response after Covid killed all these people and made the market tighter (if I’ve understood you right) – why hasn’t it happened that way in any other first world country within the same time frame? Pretty much all of them except the US have seen wages falling (or, have seen inflation rising fast enough to overpower the slight rise in wage growth).