And the voices. “Billy…”

“You fucked the whole thing up.”

“Billy, your time is up.”

“Your time… is up.”

  • 130 Posts
  • 749 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 9th, 2024

help-circle





  • The party still faces a long-term moral quandary of how to square its rhetoric about being the party of freedom, equality and racial justice with the virtually unconditional support it has offered to a far-right government in Israel that is accused of starving and bombarding large numbers of civilians in Gaza since the brutal Oct. 7 attack by Hamas.

    Oh so THIS is what it took for the NYT to give a shit about the lives of Palestinians

    For the opportunity to arrive to try to attack the Democrats by caring temporarily about them

    You fuckin dishonest hacks



  • So every so often, I have seen a story from inthesetimes.com and sort of surmised that it’s propaganda bullshit based purely on the URL, but I never really knew. This article seems like a good time to dive into it a little bit. TL;DR yes, it’s bullshit. It’s actually extremely cunning in how it assembles some true facts into a shape that doesn’t exist.

    While the Act made unprecedented investments in renewable energy, it also faced criticism for being too little, too late and for compromising on fossil fuel extraction.

    This part is 100% accurate. IDK why the headline focuses on Biden, instead of on every president before him and on Manchin for their role in causing it to be too late and too little respectively, when it’s making this accurate point, but let’s continue.

    What if, on the contrary, all the tools only make a dire crisis even worse? Because that’s exactly what’s happening: Two years and close to $300 billion later, what we’re seeing is that increased renewable energy investment goes hand in hand with increased fossil fuel production.

    Okay so this is where we dive into the real dishonesty.

    Two things I want you to notice:

    • The word “global” just kind of inconspicuously there
    • The scale on these charts is laughably different. I sort of got lost in the math, so I don’t know exactly how different, but I know that holding up a chart of “our emissions are going up and up as our energy is going up” alongside a chart of “the laughably small scale of that that comes from renewable energy is going up and up” and then implying that there’s a causal relationship there is a bunch of bullshit.

    So… without the word “global,” trying to analyze only the US’s contribution, what does it look like? Something like this:

    OH LOOK IT’S FUCKIN GOING DOWN. It’s now below the 1990 levels, after a big drop this past year.

    Why is this person going to so much trouble to lie about what’s happened to “emissions” by holding up US policy, next to global emissions? And holding up other charts next to each other and pretending that they relate to each other? And identifying (correctly) that all of this is too little too late, as a way of levying specific criticism at the most effective thing we’ve been doing, in service of depressing support for more solutions like that and consequently making it more like that we’ll go back to the days when the line actually is going up and up?

    As HST says, to ask the question is to answer the question.


  • There is a particular type of emotion which “The VVitch” and “Hereditary” get absolutely perfect. It’s actually not really my favorite type of movie; it’s not particular scary, per se, but it is just some stuff that is really awful that you don’t want to see. If you don’t want that, they may not be good, but if you vibe with that particular emotion they are hard to beat for it.

    The HBO “Chernobyl” miniseries is absolutely straight-up horror. It has pretty much all the elements of a perfect horror movie, except it’s (with tiny exceptions and artistic licenses) all 100% true.

    “As Above, So Below” is fairly good “normal” horror of a fairly unspicy flavor.

    That’s honestly all I can think of that really does it well. Horror books in my experience are far better. “The Shining,” “Pet Semetary,” “Night Shift,” and “Skeleton Crew.” Also lots and lots of HP Lovecraft; the “Dunwich Horror” collection is wonderful.

    Hope this helps.



  • Weird angel investor took us all out to a fancy dinner and made a weird extensive speech about the importance of the future; kind of “Godspeed my young protégés I know you’ll do wonderful things.” Kind of sounded like he finally believed in us and wanted to let us know with a nice gesture. Idk. No one could make any sense of it.

    The next day his lackey informed us we were all fired. Oooh, that’s what that was about; makes sense, oh well, we have to get real jobs now apparently.


  • Do you see any scenario where the IDF can allow itself to truly stop Innocent people? A soldier is being fired at from a school, should the soldier allow himself to get killed in such situation?

    The whole concept is bankrupt. An IDF soldier is being fired at from a school because he is on Palestinian land, occupying it by force to maintain the land that was stolen from the Palestinians and facilitate the taking of more.

    There are degrees. If he’s sniping schoolchildren, then that will inflame the conflict more and promote more October 7ths. If he’s “only” firing back at the school, so “defending” himself… well, it’s “better” I guess, but if you break in my house in the middle of the night and I attack you, you’re not “defending” yourself even if you limit yourself to fighting with me and not hurting my wife.

    And vice versa, considering what you know about setlers in Israel, do you really think that they will not get even more violent in the west bank if they know that their actions has no cost?

    Their actions don’t seem to have a cost though. Or rather the mechanism of retribution is so indirect and random that I don’t think that Hamas’s counterattacks make all that much difference to their calculus of what they can get away with doing to the Palestinians. I could be wrong, but that’s my impression.

    And don’t get me wrong, I wish for Hamas to vanish, and I wish for the IDF to kill only militants (even that definition is not clear), just like you. But I don’t see any realistic scenario (considering the human spirit) that this can happen. Not in the current political situation.

    Like I said, even “killing only militants” leaves Israel in the position of the war criminal. They are invading and stealing homes, farms, anything they can find and pushing the Palestinians into a vanishingly small series of refuges which they then invade in turn. Why would “militants” not fight back in that scenario? What should they do instead?

    I do agree with your take on how unrealistic peace is in the present climate. It needs to be imposed from outside by force in order to happen, which won’t happen, because the US would need to be actively involved in making that happen and the US likes things more or less as they are (or at least as they were before the counterattack after October 7th got so genocidal that it started causing political issues for leaders in the US).







  • Offer to bet him money about the outcome of some real world event that is contingent on the way he is claiming that things are

    IDK how you can apply that to AI; that’s not the best one. But you can bet that there are no workers dying of heatstroke in Amazon-supplier warehouses. You can bet him that Trump has agreed to honor the results of the election. Etc etc.

    It’s very easy to just make statements at each other. If you offer to back up your statements, then he can either refuse (in which case it’ll be harder for him to say he’s definitely right and you’re definitely wrong), or agree and then one or the other of you will learn something.

    It’s up to you. You can also just let it go. But if you want to prove him wrong it is easier to do with questions and real-world actions than it is by coming up with the perfect statements. As you’ve discovered, he’s not obligated to react to statements any way other than how he’s decided to react to them.