• FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not a single non US citizen should be extradited to the US. The US has the worst prison system and punishments outside of some really cruel regimes. They also refuse to work with international criminal courts.

      Besides I’m pretty sure the guy only committed a crime in Sweden and not the US.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How is he full of shit? Care to pick up leaks from wikileaks and point out which ones are bullshit and which ones aren’t?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              10 months ago

              His moral righteousness is irrelevant to the fact that he is being persecuted for journalism.

              It’s not like the core thing he did to even be noticed is relevant.

              The fuck does this mean? The core thing he did to be noticed is also the thing that’s getting him persecuted.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I feel like you’re not allowing two statements to be true.

                1. Assange is being doggedly pursued by the US for leaking state secrets. No I do not think he deserves to be punished for information he released like with Afghanistan. I think we are better for it and clearly this is the US making an example of him. Obviously we all knew he would be pursued, but again, I think that was the morally right thing to do, and I believe in protecting whistleblowers

                2. I also take umbrage with any attempts to make him out to be a good person or in any way virtuous, which is what the comment I responded to did. He isn’t. He had my support when he was standing for transparency, and he lost it when it became clear he saw leaks as a tool for his political preferences and friends.

                We can hold these two ideas at the same time.

                As for the sexual assault allegations against him, I have no clue what to think the waters are too muddy there. So I just don’t engage that generally.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I also take umbrage with any attempts to make him out to be a good person or in any way virtuous, which is what the comment I responded to did.

                  Did we read the same comment? They literally called him a scumbag. 🙄

                  • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    “A bit of a scumbag” dilutes the fact that he failed at the very mission people praise him for. I am happy to admit that I am was somewhat off in my initial reading of their comment. I do not want to get bogged down in that.

                    The point is that Assange was a useful tool for a certain brand of politics and certain parties. We all need to recognize that. “He’s a bit of a scum bag” isn’t even close to the reality of how nefarious his actions were.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                moral righteousness is irrelevant to the fact that he is being persecuted for journalism.

                I think the question is, when does the line between journalist and espionage intersect?

                Does his state sponsored participation in election interference count as journalism? Did his misinformation campaign during the Catalan independence movement count as journalism? How about the attempt to bribe the Trump administration for the ambassador seat to Australia?

                There’s a reason every serious journalist that Assange utilized to launch wikileaks has not only abandoned the project, but has accused Assange of financial fraud, miss handling information, and endangering their sources.

                I don’t think Julian Assange is a journalist, I think he just likes being famous, and at one point journalism was a way to do that. I don’t think he should be in jail for the rest of his life, but I also don’t think he deserves Carte Blanche for everything he’s done based on his prior “journalistic integrity”.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  There’s a reason every serious journalist that Assange utilized to launch wikileaks has not only abandoned the project, but has accused Assange of financial fraud, miss handling information, and endangering their sources.

                  Yeah, because they’d be hunted down by the US government right alongside Assange.

                  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Most of the early members of wikileaks left before the first leaks pertaining to the US. Wikileaks original focus was to expose authoritarian governments in the Middle East, ex Soviet block, and primarily China’s actions in Tibet. John Young, one of the founders actually left the group after accusing Assange of being a CIA plant after Assange wanted to do a multimillion fund raising drive.

                    The largest group to leave was before the 2010 Iraq leak, when the actual journalist at wikileaks warned Assange that the batches had not been properly redacted, and he published them anyway.

                    Fear for their source’s safety actually led wikileak’s security team to steal data from wikileaks and keep the data encrypted until Assange agreed to improve opsec. Assange ended up kicking them off the team, and they ended up having to delete the data.

                    I would really suggest reading what his early colleagues thought about his work, it really gives a lot of perspective about how poorly wikileaks was actually run, and how shady of a character Assange is.

                    Again, I’m not condoning life in prison. I just don’t think he’s the titan of ethics and moral integrity that people make him out to be. And he shouldn’t be immune to prosecution for the unethical and illegal activities he committed outside the scope of legitimate journalism.

            • Ferk@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              someone painting him as a morally righteous

              The first thing @seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM said was: “Assange is a bit of a scumbag” …

              The closest thing to “righteousness” said was: “his efforts for freedom of information should not land him in US torture prisons like many others.”

              Which, being true, it’s absolutely not challenged or contradicted by anything you said in response.

              Note that “freedom of information” is totally compatible with “picking and choosing” the manner in which you exercise that freedom. In fact, I’d argue that the freedom of “picking and choosing” what’s published without external pressure is fundamentally what the freedom of press is about.

              Assagne (like any other journalist) should have the freedom of “picking and choosing” what facts he wants to expose, as long as they are not fabrications. If they are shown to be intentionally fabricated then that’s when things would be different… but if he’s just informing, a mouthpiece, even if the information is filtered based on an editorial, then that’s just journalism. That’s a freedom that should be protected, instead of attacking him because he’s publishing (or not publishing) this or that.

    • Hubi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Can you really blame the man for picking sides after all the US has done to him personally over the years?

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes. Wikileaks is supposed to be a tool of transparency. Not a tool for his political revenge.

        • Hubi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not saying I condone what he did, but I can understand it from his perspective. I’d probably do the same thing if there were a country responsible for ruining my life and health and I had the information to inflict some damage.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I am not saying I condone what he did

            I’m not sure what we are debating/discussing. If you’re going to claim you are a bastion of transparency and information for the general public, then no, you can’t weaponize your site and omit politically damaging information about political groups you agree with/are aligned with.

            That’s not just revenge against the US. That’s failing to provide the transparency you claim to stand for. He chose to obscure information based on his own whims. How is that not an issue?

            Wikileaks had their own leak and it was a very interesting read.

            • index@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you care about transparency so much i don’ think you would be here trying to belittle someone who spent the past years in jail for the sake of transparency.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What does this have do with the fact he’s been jailed for years and is waiting extradition to usa? It literally looks like you are trying to spread dirt on him for no reason other than choosing what story to cover, something most publisher do on daily basis and on a much worst scale.

      “Trump totally didn’t offer him a pardon to say Russia had nothing to do with it.”

      You may have missed the part where he’s still in jail and the trump government had a plot to have him assasinated

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange#Later_years_in_the_embassy

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      @BolexForSoup just to be clear are you saying that journalists with a political or ideological slant should not be afforded the same protections as other journalists?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, I believe it’s pretty clear they’re saying journalists who claim total transparency should have total transparency, not obscure some things because they want to. If you claim to want to protect children and then do a bunch of things to hurt children, you lose your standing as a protector of children. The same here. If you claim total transparency and then hide certain things you lose the claim of total transparency.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          @Cethin

          If you claim total transparency and then hide certain things you lose the claim of total transparency.

          Sure. I agree. I just don’t see the relevance to whether or not you should be extradited to a foreign country that uses inhumane conditions.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh yeah, totally agree with that. I don’t know if anyone should be extradited to the US regardless of what they did.