• happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    In that top-level post the OP says it’s a photoshop they made. In the subtext link, I like that Hexbear is pretty resilient against the tactics mentioned. We consistently sniff out wreckers/adventurists/judas goats. When one reveals themselves, there’s no community effort to rally behind them.

    • FumpyAer [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I mean if someone gets banned as a wrecker and they weren’t actually trying to be one, they can just make a new account and be less terrible. If they’re capable of doing so.

      • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        There was this beautiful moment where FBI agents complained that it was hard to infiltrate anarchist groups because they couldn’t bribe anyone and had to read theory. I think it’s that latter part that makes coming back near-impossible for actual wreckers. If it’s just someone with one bad opinion they can correct that, but even if someone hasn’t actually read theory there’s a bar for having that worldview. Then within that bar there’s an overton window of what a revolutionary socialist would say and what a LARPer would say and it’s ontologically clouded by their actual worldview. There have been somewhat successful splits like we had over veganism, but I don’t think we would ever have the problems that a community like /r/antiwork has the same way /r/chapotraphouse didn’t. Our whole subculture is bullying bullies and bullshitters.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If you regularly have to make content joking about how you’re totally-not-feds because other people call you feds all the time something is extremely wrong and it makes you deeply deeply suspicious to me.