Power users and mods just keep repeating: “History is not a science because culture (i.e., god) is all-powerful. We might use evidence but we distrust grand theories.”

  • the_kid@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    that sub is usually ok, but the annoying thing about it is if you write a massive wall of text and use whatever sources, you can say whatever unhinged shit and it’s treated like the word of god.

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They just keep saying the same shit over and over again. I thought I was crazy to write that liberal historians have regressed to a pre-Enlightenment state and just replaced “god” with “culture,” but r/askhistorians is saying “yeah, that’s actually exactly what we do, and we’re proud of it!”

      No scientist would ever say “it’s impossible to understand things,” but it’s apparently a totally normal take from libs to conclude that there are no patterns to human behavior and everything is just individualistic, subjective, and random.

      • the_kid@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        interpreting history from a materialist lens makes you ‘biased’ or ‘ideological’, which is bad. historians are supposed to be like a machine, take input in and produce a compiled output of all the facts.

        source: my favorite unbiased historian, renowned for writing a biography of Churchill where he said he did nothing wrong