The sad thing is it won’t be the same. The denial of the genocide will continue. The west allowed in the one unique instance of the Holocaust acknowledgment of the crimes in order to lionize themselves, demonize their enemies and gain some moral high-ground they very desperately needed to fight the USSR and communism because they fought on the right side in WW2. Because they could paint themselves as being on the right side on that one it was trumpeted around and taught and wailed about unlike all the others before it because it was part of a narrative of triumph over evil, of the west being good, of standing and fighting for good to justify it’s atrocities and attacks on communism. This instance because they’re not just on the side-lines but actively abetting will be denied for quite some time and when it is acknowledged it’ll still be contested in the way that teaching about Jim Crow and racism in America is contested today by chuds and quite a few liberals who will acknowledge but state they had no way of knowing, they were fooled by the tricksters who ran pissrael (happily engaging in anti-semitic tropes because they have their aided the zionists card). Or some other revisionism like it was all Netanyahu and a cabal of close others and a few bad apples in the IOF and how you can’t dismiss the whole of the zionist project and you’re not allowed to talk about the polls from the era showing the overwhelming support for genocide among the zionist colonists who live in the entity, etc, etc.
In summary, the West has always happily engaged in exploitation and genocide for personal gain.
Its just when a ‘cannabalizing’ Western force / ideology emerged, the other Western powers needed a way to set themselves apart, in order to clearly define themselves as ‘good’.
The Holocaust has served that purpose for the West of the current day.
During the 19th century both South Africa and the German Empire ran “black books” on each other to justify further colonial expansion.
Inside the west they only care about genocide if it means one looks better in comparison or they use it to gain an advantage over an rival.
it will go from “there isn’t one” to “we were always against it”
I know I wouldn’t have done nothing, but I am ashamed that I haven’t done more.
“what was it like as germany started transitioning into the reich?”
“this”
