This appears to be a variation of the “standwich.” Please see the attached for an example.
The question is, if this appears on a captcha asking to click only on the sandwich images. Would you click on it?
Considering the captcha doesn’t actually know, and just judges if you are correct based off of other users entries I would click on it. My guess is most users would click it, but it’s ambiguous enough that you’d probably pass the captcha either way.
I miss when Tesco Value ham would label itself as such, rather than hiding behind fake farm names.
Ah, so this one would be a double horseshoe standwich?
Ah, but of course!
Hmm… so a steak is a salad, and a salad is nachos? Something screwy here…
Salad is only nachos if it contains croutons, won ton strips, or some other form of free-floating non-structural starch.
deleted by creator
I’m amazed this page didn’t have a featherless chicken labelled “Human”
So answer is yes
It’s sushi. The carbs form four sides of the cube.
Food identification war intensifies
The last time someone made a bagel with everything on it it put the universe in jeopardy.
The everything bagel needs to include smaller everything bagels on it or it doesn’t include everything.
Recursion
It’s two sandwiches…topologically speaking.
If you take the traditional idea of a sandwich and draw a loop around the plane where the surfaces come together you get a mathematical sandwich.
Since the bagel abomination has two such areas and you can draw non-intersecting loops around each, it follows that there are indeed two sandwiches present.
That depends on your definition of a sandwichable surface. If crust can be buttered as well and is considered equal to cut surfaces (which, coming from a rye bread country, is certainly the case with these fluffy things), then this is simply a sandwich without filling in the middle. This might also be achieved by suboptimal spreading on a single surface.
I’m pretty sure it counts as a sandwich as defined by the ham sandwich theorem. The only part that might be debatable is that the filling is not a single connected volume, but that doesn’t seem to be required by the proof.
This is clearly a sandwich. The confusion comes from how absurdly sub-optimal its construction is.
Top bun? Check
Bottom bun? Check
Yep, it’s a sandwich. I’d like to see a video of you eating it now.
It is a sandwich because the toppings are sandwiched between bread. But it’s not a good sandwich.
Now, they wouldn’t be toppings in this configuration, would they?
if it’s a sandwich it’s not “toppings” anyway.
deleted by creator
Every day we stray further from the light of lord
Yes but it’s not a very good one
What do we call it if it is also cut and filled in the conventional bagel plane?
xandwich
I like the way you think. That also leaves open the possibly of the yandwich, which is cut into three equal segments in the same way as the opening post, and the xyandwich when you combine the x and y options.
Not a Δandwich?
Now I’m just getting hungry.
Tesserwich is a possibility if you start fucking around in the Fourth dimension.
I’ve been trying to work out if, by cutting a helix around the bagel, you can create a mobius type sandwich with two, interlinked parts.
Moving in to higher dimensional bagel cutting is probably the sort of thing you can really make one’s brain hurt.
I think a Mobius bagel would be a SCP artifact. In before it’s actually cataloged and numbered.
Not an xorwich?
An xorwich would be crosscut, or ripped, but not both.
The right answer.
Sandwich cut in half
I realise that you are correct, but which way is the sandwich, and which way is the cut? It’s filled on both planes.
Some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Goodbye horseshoe theory hello half-bagel theory.
The theory of a donut shaped galaxy is genius. I stole it from Homer Simpson.
According to that, I think OP would have a sandwich.
It’s a sandwich, but it’s not a sandwich sandwich
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/watch?v=O9ak89FwYeI
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
No, a sandwich is made from slices of bread.
Is this not a piece of bread that was sliced in half?
doesn’t make it slices
What about an Ice Cream Sandwich? No bread, but sandwich is in the name.
Cube rule says starch is on the outside, so it’s a sandwich.
IF you refuse to recognize the cookie as a starch, then an ice cream sandwich is a salad.
Salad, mah fav
thus no sandwich
deleted by creator
Are you suggesting that baguette is not bread?
It’s definitely not slices of bread.
Maybe it’s not pre-sliced industrial factory produced pseudo-bread. Assuming that’s what you mean.
But as you described it, it’s definitely slices of bread.
It’s not sliced bread.
if slicing is the correct term for cutting something in half, then slicing something does not necessarily give you slices
The issue is that you guys
gavehave a very restrictive definition of bread that’s very US centric.I didn’t give any definition of bread. The pictured bagel and also a cut-open baguette are bread, but neither of those are slices of bread, but thats what makes a sandwich.
deleted by creator
A French Sub, so L’Englouti.
a stuffed baguette
you cant just label any combination of food that contains bread a sandwich