albigu@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agoThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1external-linkThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comalbigu@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squareBureaucrat@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·9 months agojfc please have some dignity, you know you can do better than that
minus-squareOwl [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·9 months agoThis restaurant has a terrible food safety rating so I just eat off their floor.
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·9 months agoSay how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
minus-squareBureaucrat@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-29 months agoLiterally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
minus-squareInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months ago Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers. If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoDoes listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?
minus-squarePrehensile_cloaca @lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months ago“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”
jfc please have some dignity, you know you can do better than that
This restaurant has a terrible food safety rating so I just eat off their floor.
Say how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
Literally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?
Does listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?
“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”