albigu@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 hours agoThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down10
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comalbigu@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoSay how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
minus-squareFlocklesscrow@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 minutes ago“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”
minus-squareBureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-29 hours agoLiterally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
minus-squareInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 hours ago Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers. If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?
Say how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”
Literally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?