THEY RUINED HER, by doing what the original creator intended in 1996.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    I wonder if the 1996 dudebro would get upset if the hawt lezbian akkktion they want, male gaze focused and all, actually involved intimacy, tenderness, and a lasting relationship instead of “we have additional sex for you also, senpai” open-ended plausibility for the dudebro watching it.

    • Cammy [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I think if they hinted at women having agency without men, it would be very poorly received. That is, if it wasn’t given an AO rating for pornographic content.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I was there for the 90s, and the sheer tackiness of the everywhere horniness in marketing was laughably bad, even by many modern standards. For example, it wasn’t uncommon for video game advertising to not even feature much of the actual game, just horny pictures and edgy remarks about what a loser the potential buyer is (for some reason hating their potential buyers openly was a common marketing strategy back then). CW for nudity in the first picture.

        Lara Croft was advertised for the male gaze as much as possible, though her actual characterization was pretty much ignored in such marketing stunts.