The kicker:

The system isn’t purely run on AI. It also relies on human input to help it learn and become more accurate.

And then

And so far it’s getting high marks from employees

(no employees interviewed or cited)

Who call it “Bo-Linda”

Love to regurgitate company PR material as fact

  • kleeon [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Was it? Maybe in western parlance it was, but I think that’s completely inaccurate and is being pushed by companies to market their products

    Like, why would you call decision trees or linear regression “Intelligent”? I feel like we’re just watering down what intelligence means at this point

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m still disgusted by computer touchers using “meat” prefixes to denigrate human beings and make the computers they touch seem somehow more uplifted.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Like, why would you call decision trees or linear regression “Intelligent”? I feel like we’re just watering down what intelligence means at this point

      It’s crude reductionism in the form of “if you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail” thinking.