• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I get what you mean, but that would backfire increadibly quickly.

    Civil rights organizations would no longer be able to talk with politicians directly, possibly never, as demonstrations and manifestations could be classified as lobbying depending on how strict it would be enforced.

    Environmental groups could no longer invite politicians to important conferences.

    Lobbying isn’t just something that monolithic companies do, take it away, and it will only be something the bad guys does.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yup, a late friend of mine was a lobbyist at the state level for a mental health lobbying group. His daughter has schizophrenia and that was his way to give back in his retirement. Without lobbying, it’s hard for politicians to know when there is a problem they need to fix. They have a small staff and they don’t just magically know when there is a problem. The problem is when a politician either can’t sniff out unethical lobbyists or just doesn’t care.

    • 0stre4m@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please what’s the power of NGOs compared to corporations?

      Just make an exception for charities and non-profit.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Keep in mind that the person you reply to isn’t wrong: Big corpos would still be lobbying, as they got the resources to hide it effectively and keep everyone trying to sue them over suspicions of lobbying stuck in litigation hell.

        Anybody less affluent would however find it impossible to do any lobby work. Environmental agencies etc.

        This is one of those situations where just outlawing something does the least affect the very party you would want to hit most.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s a better approach I think, yes. It’ll be difficult to prevent collusion but effectivey capping the size of most companies and maybe their across-border reach would be a good way to keep a tighter leash on them.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You’d accept possibly loosing the right to demonstrate or to hold a manifestation or protest?

        That is not the world I want to live in.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Wut? It is supremely American to think you can only talk to politicians if you have money… and only because so many other people are willing to purchase a slice of their time.

          I can just walk to Peter Julian’s office and, assuming I’m not rude, talk to him about something that matters to me. I’ve had conversations with Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders - I used to board game with a state senator. It it might be hard to get a lunch date with Joe Biden but politicians spend the majority of their time just talking to folks… it’s only when the rich can use their money to monopolize time that shit breaks down.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            Those meetings you have had with politicians could absolutely be classified as lobbying, and would be made illegal if lobbying was outlawed.

            A company have the resources to make a smokescreen around meetings like that, making it harder to prove lobbyism, the lobbyist just happened to stay at the same hotel as the politician did, they even arrived a week before, and left two days after the politician arrived, it’s not like a meeting was set up on the one overlapping day, that would be crazy…

            • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              Those meetings you have had with politicians could absolutely be classified as lobbying, and would be made illegal if lobbying was outlawed.

              It’s not just classified as lobbying, it’s litterally what Lobbying is about. Meeting politician to tell them that the environmental law reforms means that the factory will close or that the consumer need better protection regarding toxic chemical in their food is what Lobbyist do. It’s sometimes get even funnier when they change employer and therefore political side