Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 6 days agoBut at what cost?hexbear.netimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down11
arrow-up1133arrow-down1imageBut at what cost?hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·6 days agoI see that Economist finally got honest about their own motto
minus-squareBeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·6 days agoMakes me wonder if this screencap is fake.
minus-squarecontext [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·6 days agonope! that is an accurate depiction lmao https://www.economist.com/china/2021/06/22/chinas-average-retirement-age-is-ridiculously-low-54
minus-squarecombat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·6 days agoI think it’s a shitty pun about the subject of the article but damn it goes hard as an economist descriptor
minus-squarewheresmysurplusvalue [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-25 days agoThat’s hilarious
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [they/she]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoThe only thing that would have been better is “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”
I see that Economist finally got honest about their own motto
Makes me wonder if this screencap is fake.
nope! that is an accurate depiction lmao
https://www.economist.com/china/2021/06/22/chinas-average-retirement-age-is-ridiculously-low-54
lmao holy shit
I think it’s a shitty pun about the subject of the article but damn it goes hard as an economist descriptor
That’s hilarious
The only thing that would have been better is “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”