It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just “other professionals”.
A thesis isn’t just an exam, it’s a real scientific paper.
And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.
And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.
Yeah but if your wrote your thesis in 2024, and the detector is run on it in 2026…
You’re probably busted.
It’s not like you’ll re-write your thesis with every major ChatGPT release.
I bet AI detection is going to get a lot better over time.
I wonder if there’s going to be retrospective testing of theses as time goes on.
Could really damage some careers down the line.
Edit: guys, retrospective testing means it was done later (i.e. with a more up to date AI detector).
Don’t get really drunk or stoned and end up being obnoxious.
Try to be aware of traffic (especially bikes) and of blocking sidewalks/alleys etc. Look both ways on every lane of traffic you cross (including both bike lanes).
Try to branch out your trip from the exact center of the city (or by the train station) and don’t rent an Airbnb inside the city center (they drive up local rents).
If you’re standing on red bricks or red tarmac, you’re probably blocking the bike lane.
If you can’t see the bike lane, it’s likely that you’re standing in it (they aren’t always marked).
It adds a lot more legitimacy to people protesting the crimes, which is important.
I like to call pair-programming sessions (for bugs) “bebuggery sessions” at work and people haven’t complained yet.
“erotic aid for penis without usb”
This implies the existence of…
Some diff tools don’t handle indentation by default.
So if you add a wrapper, it counts everything inside it as “changed”
sets the diff to ignore whitespace
Lines changed: 3
Ah yes, the American dream.
I imagine it’s more about discouraging any kind of official organising or institutional support/advertising.
Dangerous for politicians to promote it, or charities to give it resources/attention.
This keeps the scale of the boycott low enough to make less of a difference.
Also I guess it tries to shift those on the side of the ban to be the “moral authority”.
Ah good point.
So your issue is a matter of labelling rather than science.
You put a rope on it. The rope goes around the generator shaft/alternator as it would be with a steam/wind turbine.
You get the first hundred a month for free.
Maybe you could ration it for when you need high-quality searches?
I’m trying out a paid Google called Kagi for a month.
It’s pretty good so far and very fast.
And no ads or SEO prioritisation, which is the key part.
Or tracking/data-retention, so they say (it’s not open source so we only have their word for it).
As a note, the guys who publish these mashups are called PoliticsJOE and they have a great YouTube channel for independent British news.
They also for some reason publish these.
Not that I dislike the videos, that’s how I found the channel.
It’s just they make up maybe 5% of the posted content (the rest of which is actual journalism lol).
There is a part of the dog training book “Total Recall” by Pippa Mattinson that refers to this.
Pie-in-a-bush is her way of explaining the Jackpot reward training method.
Very surreal to see it realised so.
If something was written by V3 and then published, that text doesn’t get updated every time a new version of chatGPT comes out.
The text isn’t dynamic.