Is anything other than sexting referred to as inappropriate when a minor is involved?

Like early Netflix before they all decided they would make their own shitty streaming services and didn’t renew contracts.

Huh, my first thought was that they went to the farm upstate where everyone’s pets end up.

Say it ain’t so!

Note they left the “…and improved” off the (New) title.

I read his hopefulness about having a future as being in the context of the fear of total global annihilation through nuclear war.

Tons od science fiction is current social issues in a new context which allows for lots of preconceptions to be ignored.

Because that eould be admitting defeat which loses a ton of territory and abandons a lot of Ukranian.

Russia is not anywhere close to winning the war, so there is no reason to capitulate.

Yeah, I don’t judge any member of a minority that doesn’t trust a US run medical progam anymore as their concerns are valid based on facts.

Yeah, this is just trading the possible need to open after installing for needing to close the app I wanted to use later. I see it as trading one click for two swipes.

Removed by mod

Like the startups that ‘disrupt’ the established system by ignoring laws and breaking the parts that worked and selling it like an improvement.

‘Ride sharing’ (unregulated cabs) was only cheaper because of investor funding allowing them to undercut on pricing, abusing the concept of contract workers, and the companies ignoring laws. That isn’t ‘disruptive’ by being innovative, that is cheating the system.

Like all sayings, there is context for moving fast and breaking things.

The saying means that when creating something new for profit, don’t worry too much about trying to figure out all the details beforehand and figure it out as you go. This will inevitably cause things to break, but being able to quickly fix that when it happens is the same skills needed to create new features as you go.

The saying does not work with large and complex established systems where breaking things wreak havoc.

I think the biggest problem is that ai for now is not an exact tool that gets everything right.

The biggest problem is that it isn’t an exact tool, but is being presented as if it was and implemented as a replacement for people instead of a tool they can use to make themselves more efficient.

Whereas the “real” hover board that exists has wheels.

Hovercraft have existed for decades and actually hover which makes everyone just accepting Hoverboards as wheeled infuriating.

This is microsoft, so I expect unhealthy competition.

Then some hackers get in and reprogram the AI CEOs to value long term profit and employee training and productivity. The company grows and is massively profitable until some venture capitalists swoop in and kill the company to feed from the carcass.

Tech CEOs or AI?

Just kidding, I know it is both.

Elected positions always have that risk, but normally there is some kind of expectation of relevant experience by voters.

Less time is spent handling on-call issues if you do the code reviews, documentation, and testing…

It’s probably pretty similar to sports. Some people are naturals, but almost anyone can learn to be really good at them, it just takes a shitload of work.

Being a natural at something is being good at pattern recognition, whether it is music, sports, cooking, writing, or pretty much anything prople can be good at. While the vast majority of people can get good at things through practice, there are people on the opposite end from the people where it comes naturally that won’t be able to do better than a beginnger even with a lot of practice.

There are the equivalents of being tone deaf for pretty much everything humans do.