No im saying laws are tools for the manufacture of consent, usually at the cost of truth, justice, freedom.

Id guess 50501 contracted with off duty cops.

Oh. Most new doctrine that doesnt suck is from queer people. Sometimes, like the way the doctrine of ‘special forces’ was invented, it is itself a gay thing.

This is what laws are for, america is just a little more explicit about it than most places.

nonaligned

No that would be gay. Not allowed.

Welcome to what i have seen called the ‘years of lead paint’.

Wow, okay, no need to be hyperbolic; we haven’t managed to pull that one off yet.

Wow. Bigot.

American jackbooted thuggery is a diverse rainbow of institutions and traditions. It’s kind of a huge part of american culture. Maybe don’t be so insensitive and flatten entire cultures into charicatures?

LOL that was you? App i use didn’t say.

Okay, so, i no longer think you’re malicious or being paid.

No, no; totally the same. I was agreeing with you.

any more than you do

True. And i lie about everything that isnt sarcasm.

believe

No im saying if you agree, it’s reason to doubt.

big philosophy

How do you think people work?

How do you think this ‘free will’ works?

Do you think everyone’s as dishonest as you?

What do you think ‘credibility’ is?

What do you think is going on with this wacky ‘internet’ thing?

I literally said it’s not different!

And yes, my anarchist senses were tingling on the first reports here. I just knew.

people were

Yeah, you caught me. Im the mystical anthropomorphized fuhrer-principle-but-real-and-for-anarchists.

So you don’t live in a place with laws? Must be nice.

What ice guy?

You keep repeating these narratives, but youre just damaging your ien credibility.

Now im thinking ‘_cryptagion’ agreed with me, i should probably double check my sources.

Really?

Right. Those bullet thieves are usually guilty though.

What, you expect me to have evidence?

Something was off in the first descriptions.

how is that different

Than the guy who purchased data on his targets walked in with a disguise, killed them, killed their dog, and posted a manifesto about it?

I guess it’s not.

It’s really hard to act predictably when there’s people pointing guns at each other.

Like really really difficult. You don’t have any context for decisions, and everything feels kind of surreal. Anyone who says they know how they would act for sure is probably lying. Anyone who says they know for sure how someone else would act is probably talking shit.

Edit: and this isn’t even factoring in panic. Which some people do. It’s a whole thing. It’s maybe why some people get weird and romantic and addicted about it; the kind of ambient possibility that opens up when things are on the knife’s edge of violence. Like it cuts through all the scripts and bullshit.

It has its own scripts of course, if anyone competent is involved. But for someone who has never even considered going off script before, i can see how an unhealthy fascination could arise.

Maybe also why all the innovations in fighting come from queers.