ये हंगाम-ए-विद-ए-शब है ज़ुल्मत के फ़रज़ंदो,

सहर के दोश पर गुलनार परचम हम भी देखेंगे,

तुम्हें भी देखना होगा ये आलम हम भी देखेंगे

– Sahir Ludhianvi

  • 2 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2025

help-circle

  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlsomeone teach them LaTeX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    According to this article, even the value of epsilon is wrong. Epsilon stands for ‘price elasticity’, which seems to measure how much tariffs would affect the price of an item. 0.25 is the value used by the White House, but some economists have come out saying it is actually closer to 0.945, indicating that prices are affected far greater by tariffs than what these buffoons claim. But even with the correct value, the formula makes no sense.

    Without the fancy shit, it’s basically (exports/imports) - 1.




  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlStalin the mysagonist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Yeah because working outside and still doing all the domestic work is so much better than being confined to the house. Who needs feminism?

    No doubt the Soviet Union was a huge step forward for women but this is just a dumb thing to say. Women doing unpaid household labour and emotional labour has always been the case.










  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAny tips for a new user?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Dude, I know. I am an Indian too, and a socialist. Getty and Thurston definitely aren’t cold war propagandists. It is Robert Conquest, Anne Applebaum and more recently, Timothy Snyder who portray the famine as an intentional genocide done by evil Soviets. Getty and Thurston, especially Thurston was actually notorious for taking a more pro-Soviet stance. Wheatcroft and Davies did important work showing that the famine was caused by a combination of bad harvest and poor planning. As far as I am aware, the popular genocide/deliberate starvation line is not the historical consensus and has not been for some time after the opening of Soviet archives. Even liberal historians like Fitzpatrick and Krotkin debunk the many capitalist lies about the famine. People discussing it online generally have a very strange assortment of sources - from Snyder’s terrible book ‘Bloodlands’ to obsolete books like Tottle’s ‘Fraud, Famine and Fascism’ which was written before the opening of Soviet archives. r/AskHistorians is a good source for finding both Marxist and liberal sources, and it generally avoids neoconservatives like Conquest.

    I am from the South too but am Marathi.



  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAny tips for a new user?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    .world really isn’t very tolerant of certain views. They are very quick to dismiss people as Russian shills/bots for instance. I disagree with this instance’s views of China and the Russo-Ukraine war, and am not an ML (though I do kind of lean Leninist) and haven’t seen much bad faith name calling. It certainly is prevalent in leftist spaces (CIA bot, NAFO shill, etc) but this place is surprisingly decent.