Despite all my rage I’m still a rat refreshing this page.

I use arch btw

Credibly accused of being a fascist, liberal, commie, anarchist, child, boomer, pointlessly pedantic, a Russian psychological warfare operative, and db0’s sockpuppet.

Pronouns are she/her.

Vegan for the iron deficiency.

  • 2 Posts
  • 291 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • Realistically I’ll have to look into this before trusting a random comment and I probably wont because it’s half the world away from me and he’s dead anyway.

    I am sure there is some subtly in personal culpability though because between Mao and peasants killing birds was a whole bureaucracy that evidentally thought it was worth doing (and idk how much is slavish obedience/fear).

    Temujin personally killed a lot of people. Like personally ordered the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and his overall campaign was ~10% of human population at the time an estimated 40 million, which seems to be comparable to famine figures even if we personally blame both of them. Dude was a certified maniac and I think that especially given the overall lower population at the time and deliberate murderous intentions stands as histories greatest monster and most murderous person.


  • Like personally? I often feel like attributing famines solely to one person is a bit messed up, although there are cases like Bengal where specific government individuals were enthusiastic .

    The party later distanced themselves from him somewhat, so presumably they thought his ideas could be improved on but I had thought a lot of china and USSR famines rested on really dumb ideas about industrial agriculture that were popular in many places + officials hiding bad numbers + desperate need to show immediate superiority of alledgedly better numbers + upheavals of massive civil was and ww2.









  • You should probably know that historically societies collapsing has typically resulted in improved health of the lower classes as judged by skeletons in the archeological record.

    We should not really understand societies collapsing as a violent or spectacular thing. It’s usually just growth slowing, people move away, the ability of states to enforce taxes and provide services weakens and people work out their own stuff.

    I’m not saying society is collapsing, just that if it does it’ll probably look more like declining birthrates and movement away from cities and advanced manufacturing to more agrarian lifestyle. Also that for the poor and downtrodden this will probably, on average, be an improvement.


  • I dunno. Pillars of eternity and tyranny have some pretty interesting stuff in them. They’re modern right?

    Tyranny was particularly amazing, there are a lot of very mixed choices to make and you can legalese your way out of a shitload of accountability. In fact

    gameplay path

    You can legalese so fucking hard the literal avatar of justice/law turns on the evil empire and sides with you :::.

    I think it manages to make playing someone stuck in the military bureaucracy of an evil empire trying to stay alive and torn between loyalties pretty interesting.








  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomovies@hexbear.netLOL, LMAO even
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 months ago

    Political violence is when you do violence to the political people and the more political the more violence it is. Other violence is never political, especially when it’s done by political institutions. The more political the person doing the violence, the less political and violence it is.


  • Tbh I think person focused soc med just tends to be a shit fest in the public sphere. It works fine if we go old school FB or MySpace, where you just follow people you actually know and that’s all you see. Once it becomes public though it seems like it’s favoured by people with nasty intentions or orients itself around cults of personality.

    I think topic focused is better for public interaction personally. It’s still awful but at least it’s less dominated by whatever bullying is currently popular. Also it’s easier to filter out the complete brain-rot of amplification of dumb hateful stuff (“look at this terrible take” stuff that just spreads the name of horrible people/movements).

    Anyway, irc was our Eden and every day we stray further from god.


  • I’ve been on mastodon for years and I don’t recommend it.

    It’s dominated by usaians to the point where it’s basically impossible to find anything interesting. Even instances explicitly based around other countries tend to get dominated by usaians unless they moderate them away which sucks.

    There have been recent advances in discoverability but generally finding stuff via trying hashtags or third channels is still required.

    Due to harassment many people post follower only and require followers to be approved which further harms discoverability.

    Finally, it’s so excessively cliquey. Like lemmy has the divide between the commies and the fashies with the broader lib audience falling between the two large blobs of aligned instances somewhere. Masto has sooooo many tiny little instances and their highly curated fed list. All helped along but peak tumbler-twitter lib style ‘discourse’ where some week someone says something moderately abrasive and suddenly admins are choosing sides on whether lift buttons are uninclusive of one-armed bonobos which moments ago nobody had ever thought about.

    Don’t get me wrong, stuff needs discussing often, but the way twitter style posting works imho tends to lead to unconstructive and reactionary takes.