Maybe not. Ample time to make an independent judgement whether to downvote.
OP, if you suspect financial crimes are being committed, you should not be tipping off those involved by publicising this.
Maybe not. Ample time to make an independent judgement whether to downvote.
OP, if you suspect financial crimes are being committed, you should not be tipping off those involved by publicising this.
10 minutes is a long time on the internet.
“Authentic engagement”? It’s been a matter of minutes since you accused people on Lemmy of being sockpuppets…
I quit with the death of RiF.
Well regarded.
Return of the Obra Dinn.
“Female” as an adjective isn’t the problem. The problem is “female” as a noun.
You can describe a person as being female all you like, but if you start calling them “a female” & defined purely in terms of the existence of their sex organs, you’re in the wrong.
Yes, I’ve seen the screenshot. Eh. It’s a gross post, and apparently OP acted like twat; I won’t lose sleep over it not getting attention.
All the top posts on r/askwomennocensor seem to be women complaining about how the sub is overrun with men asking for dating tips, with the mods stating in a thread 16 days ago:
We remove a thing, and suddenly we get called fascist, tyrant, “chronically online,” etc., and members wildly upvote those public callouts.
Yall gotta decide if yall want “fascist tyrants” or to be plagued with inane incel questions. We remove a dating question? “Tyrants!” We let it go? “Why is this sub so trashy?”
As one redditor notes:
I know this sub was created because the other asksubs have so many rules. But this is unfortunately one of the reasons why so many rules exist.
… unwelcoming of misogyny? Surprising.
When it’s used like that it is.
You wouldn’t describe a man as “a male”, and you wouldn’t refer to your mother as “a female”.
The UK had Grenfell just a few years ago.
As a Brit, I’m interpreting this as some top-notch humour. I don’t know if that was the intention. That pesky Poe’s Law at work.
Lecturing a person from a Finnish instance about how Stalin was “admirable in every regard” is a bold move.
The part complaining about a lack of Russian state-controlled news media?
Then sincerely hope that doesn’t impact any investigation by the authorities.