• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle
  • Which is kind of my point. Even on Lemmy the “data ownership” isn’t really up to the individual users, it’s the instance owners. The only way to 100% control where your data goes (as an user) and who looks at it, is if you run your own instance. Otherwise you are still at the mercy of another master, hopefully a more benevolent one.

    And if the instance that most new users default to is lemmy.world and that instance is 100K users strong, I think the “smaller instance” argument doesn’t really apply there for most users.









  • habanhero@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlEat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is some support for lower income brackets but my personal opinion is there should not be “billionaires” in the first place, and that’s where the system falls short. “Billions” is an obscene amount of wealth to be had by one person.

    Edit: Here is a visualization on how much billions of dollars really is. Truly mind-blowing.


  • Not income at all which and also the reason why it’s taxed very differently (and perhaps unfairly).

    Income is your wage or the actual money you make from your business. Most rich people generate wealth via their assets (e.g, the stock / property they own skyrocketed in value), and these are only taxed when sold and at a much lower rate.


  • habanhero@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlEat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their wealth is almost entirely in assets which gets taxed at a much lower rate compared to income, and only when they sell. And don’t forget about all the write-off, tax tricks their armies of lawyers and accountants can set up for them. So if you work for your wages then the system is definitely stacked against you.