Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
No one said anything is beneath senior employees.
It’s a lost opportunity when you, a staff engineer, spend your time doing something that a junior engineer could do – instead of doing a task a junior engineer can’t do.
It’s faulty, short-sighted logic though. If every company trained juniors, only for them to jump ship in two years, there’d be a pool of trained juniors to hire from. Yes you wouldn’t get your investment out of that particular person, but you’d be hiring someone else’s investment.
Beyond that, there’s work that is better suited to more junior employees because it’s literally a waste of the senior employees’ skills.
Too many industries are shitting on entry level employees now… They’re easy targets for layoffs and easy targets for AI, apparently. Now they’re already complaining about the lack of quality talent.
If you don’t invest in the next set of entry-level employees, you won’t have the next set of qualified employees.
Am I missing it, or is there no way to organize the Drawer, either by folder or tab?
Checkout https://infosec.exchange instead of blocking Threads, the admin made a second instance for people who wanted Threads blocked. Like 40 people migrated, lol
Your hyperbole makes it obvious you have no place in a reasonable debate about this topic.
I love when people conflate rights and ethics. I agree with you that no one has a right to be listed on Fedi Garden. And I still think it’s not nice to pressure admins into taking choice away from users.
“I don’t think it’s nice to federate with a company that has been cited in multiple independent reports of massacres/genocides,”
And I don’t think it’s nice to take the choice away from users. I can block threads all on my own – I don’t need a nanny who doesn’t even cite their sources.
The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.
.
I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.
.
…it was not beneficial to me.
.
…new to gaining good visibility through open source,
Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.
“Monday”.length is working JavaScript and does equal 6. No print command afaik though.
Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they’re looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn’t that just standard American copyright?
Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.
This blog from the maintainer makes it clear they have no interest in open source other than to advertise their own skills
Appreciate you giving credit where credit is due. It is 100% corporate greed.
Thanks for your comment. I usually travel alone and was like “why would anyone subject themselves to AirBNB.” I appreciate the context and perspective.
Interesting article! I can’t tell from the post, though, is this due to a limitation on bots in Matrix or that no one has invested to make a similar bot for Matrix?
Fun fact, it’s been two different groups of people in charge! Yahoo! was responsible for removing adult content and then sold it to Automattic for pennies on the dollar. Automattic then went through several rounds of different poor moderation before the CEO himself stepped up to share GDPR violating information on Twitter. Now we’re adding AI!
To make matters worse, they keep reusing the same names for things. I honestly don’t know if I use Google Pay or Google Wallet? I just push the credit card icon on my phone.
It’s a video game show that uses the rules of the video game world.