Honestly, I found it really easy. I don’t have a background in IT or anything either.

What did you find difficult? Setting custom firewall rules is harder to understand, but the general functionality of setting up a NAT and even installing and configuring ZenArmor were super super easy.

OPNSense is generally pretty easy, more powerful, and more open than pfsense. I started with pf but went to OPNSense and have loved it!

Are you sure that docker is configured properly? What do you see if you do docker ps

There are mumble -> matrix bridges you can set up. It doesn’t integrate with element, it integrates with matrix, for which matrix is a client.

That won’t keep it constantly in sync though

I met my partner on hinge. Dating apps can be hit or miss, but I found it decent.

I picked up a Roborock S5 vacuum and flashed valetudo onto it. It’s so fun!

This will work, as long as you both have the same client version.

Can you ping the two devices private IP’s from each other though? That narrows down where the issue is.

Can you ping the tablet from the device running searx, or the device running searx from your tablet? Termux is a good app to test.

What device are you trying to access it on? The same device?

Ahh got it. My search history says I read the follow up, but not the initial article.

https://www.theverge.com/23573362/anker-eufy-security-camera-answers-encryption

That’s ridiculous and unsettling, especially that they claimed it wasn’t possible initially. I wonder if they were not aware that it was possible or whether they were lying. I’m not sure which one is worse.

I have a eufy doorbell cam, and I’m genuinely very happy with it. Since it’s not actually looking into my home I’m less concerned about this particular security issue. I hope they do better moving forward.

Is your local IP a private, or public IP?

Does it start with 192, for example?

How are you determining your local IP?

Why not?

Could you link the information about the “special patches to play leaked games”? That is not my memory at all.

Your memory is in line with mine, I have no idea what pro-piracy things the previous commenter is referring to, but would like to read about it.

I absolutely did! I was really hoping to teach a class about audio at a nearby university, but was told last minute that they can’t give it to me for bureaucratic reasons. It’s my dream to teach someday so I’m hopeful that I will find another University that will let me teach

I work in audio and had a thesis in DSP, so I’ll try to explain this. It is an interesting idea, and in some cases could work, but wouldn’t be practically useful in most.

So there’s 2 types of audio encoding: Lossy and Lossless. All audio starts as lossless, and in many cases is converted to lossy to reduce the file size. The processing for this is NOT like compression, and is somewhat context aware in that it removes frequencies you wouldn’t hear because something else is more present and causing your ear not to really hear it (this is called masking).

If you were to upscale something that is lossless, it would probably work. Barring any inter sample peaks, you’d be inferring additional points in a waveform and that’s fine. They’re actually some audio plugins that do this as an intermediate step when processing a signal.

If you try to upscale something that is lossy, you can’t recreate what was removed, because there isn’t a way to infer that information anymore. It would be like if you were trying to upscale a photo but you’d already removed a dog that was somewhat obscured by a man’s hand. Even if you upscale the picture you can’t add the dog without somebody telling you that it was there before removal.

The other part of the equation is “why?”, and while I’m a bit of an audiophile and I have my collection of lossless audio, the limitations of the system are typically the human ear. CD quality, (16-bit at 44.1 Khz), is really all you’d ever need. Most people can’t hear above 20 kilohertz (if you’re over 18, you’re lucky if you even get close to that). In digital audio, you can reproduce any frequency in equal to or less than half of the sample rate. With 44.1Khz, that frequency is 20,050hz. If you want to go really crazy, DVD quality (24 bit at 48Khz). I consider anything about that nice to have from a archival and measurement standpoint, but there’s no point in terms of human listening.

Yes, and CRTs as well.

Like a steinberger?