![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/9e1c89e6-e9e4-4a48-819e-c725d75e70c9.png)
I don’t need a plan to know what needs to be done
I don’t need a plan to know what needs to be done
is this really an option with all the conflicts and how many Palestinians have been displaced?
seems to me the first thing to do is to tear down the wall. then we can let the palestinian people reclaim their homes.
Kill all the Jew
you keep bringing this up, but you’re the only one
the link to the present is not that clear cut.
it’s an event in living memory that has never been rectified
you made bad faith assumptions against them.
i am unconvinced this is true.
I don’t see how I am “parroting” Israeli propaganda though.
claiming boycott is antisemitic and clamiing “from the river to the sea” is antisemitic are both israeli propaganda, and you’re parroting it.
And if people use the same rhetoric (“from the river to the sea”), why wouldn’t I warn against this antisemitic rhetoric?
it’s not antisemitic
Well, you cannot deny that there are many antisemites that would want to kill all the Jews.
what does this have to do with the leftists organizing an economic blockade? nothing.
there’s a “river to the sea” comment right there from someone else. So I can see where they might have gotten that impression.
only a bad faith interpretation could have led anyone to think it’s antisemitism.
But imo it just is not as easy to say that the whole state of Israel with all the people living in it is the enemy here.
the whole state of israel and its supporters are the enemy.
It is obviously easier to organize if there is one clear enemy, like Putin or Erdogan.
nazis in ukraine aren’t my comrades either.
you think it’s a good policy to ban fellow anarchists for having a nuanced view on the Gaza situation
that’s not what it’s about. it’s about bad faith accusations of antisemitism against principled organizers.
you are the only person badjacketing in this post
i was called antisemitic
an anarchist community doesn’t allow badjacketing and punching left, something this user is doing.
if it were up to me, we would have the same policies as reddit’s anarchism subreddit.
and they would not tolerate this user’s comments.
my concern isn’t instance-wide rules. as i said, in another community, my tact would have been totally different. my concern is whether this is actually an anarchist community or no.
if these same opinions were being voiced in c/politics or c/news, my pushback would be decidedly different. this is an anarchist community, and frankly i don’t believe the other user’s operating in good faith. just saying “i’m an anarchist” is a pretty thin shield for accusing principled organizers of antisemitism and derailing discussion about a global coordinated resistance movement.
i think it’s super cool that an admin is weighing in (since i think that means my reports are being read), but maybe we could get an anarchist to actually do some of the moderation here.
the project of setting up Israel as a nation state is a genocidal colonialist project. dissembling about this, suggesting it was acceptable, that the occupied people should only resist within the boundaries you set, shows you aren’t opposed to the genocidal colonialist project.
you accused them of wanting to kill all the Jews. you’re backpedaling now.
your discourse is patronizing and disrespectful to me and my ability to understand what’s going on. you are hijacking a discussion about how to stop a colonialist genocide to wring your hands about oppressed people possibly winning and treating their occupiers like they’ve been treated.
I don’t believe you’re an anarchist because you are derailing a solidarity action and accusing anarchists of being antisemitic.
bye