AKA
tf? You mean to tell me that there’s something billies can’t money their way out of? I’m temporarily impressed, right up until they do that, too.
Apollo user here, can confirm: I really love its interface. Wiped the Reddit account nevertheless.
Should this be called “the spez effect”?
Technically correct is the best correct?
Agreed on all points, friend.
I grew up in it, too, and now I’m a basic LaVeyan Satanist. gg authoritarian regressives!
Goddamn, that boy couldn’t dig a hole faster even if he was teleported to the center of the earth by pure magic.
Uplike for casual use of the exclamation “egads”, and would you please tell me what browser script(s) you used? I’d be much obliged!
Goddamn, that was a very tough read.
Many of the users there appear to be unconcerned about their future ability to access the platform they’re currently on that allows them to express how unconcerned they are about their future ability to access the platform.
Being federated, I too, am as unconcerned about what happens to them and their platform as they appear to be.
For the users that do care, hopefully they will care enough about their future selves to get federated as well, despite the understandable urge to cling to what is dying.
Get federated (until the fediverse gets enshittified) or get your platform monetized into uselessness.
It just doesn’t fucking stop with these degenerates!
jesus fucking christ. The only thing that’s ever been connected to either the numbers 616 or 666… is Christians irrational terror of them, all induced by their book. GJ.
So I can claim that over a million people on both platforms run their due diligence and actually click on cited sources, disregard your demand for proof, and you still won’t have done anything to prove me wrong? Do I have that correct?
“Eroxon! Apply directly to the dickhead!”
That still wouldn’t prove me wrong, there could be users the sources don’t cover.
If I said over a million users on each platform, what would you do to prove me wrong?
Is your argument that “There’s misinformation everywhere, so I should just get it from an algorithm that’s so good that I only really see what I want to see.”?
Because if so, you’ve already ended your argument, whether you realize it or not.
They stated their point in the last sentence: “Its algorithm makes it really easy to fall into an echo chamber.” Did you read their comment?
Oh well.