I would have thought so too, but they’re working on at least one. Although you’re right about a lot of places being unfeasible–anything more than dirt/gravel in a very limited number of communities would be cost prohibitive.
I would have thought so too, but they’re working on at least one. Although you’re right about a lot of places being unfeasible–anything more than dirt/gravel in a very limited number of communities would be cost prohibitive.
Those are the exact things I’m looking for (just waiting for a few more roads to connect towns). I’m glad to hear it’s living up to the expectations I’ve heard of!
I went to Iceland a couple years ago and the landscapes are amazing, but there are definitely areas where you run into a lot of tourists, busses, etc.
I’m visiting the Faroe Islands later this year and I’m hoping to experience some rugged landscapes in relative isolation there too.
I’d definitely like to go there someday too–it’s just a bit too remote for me at the moment.
I can see its tourism becoming what Iceland was like 15-20 years ago.
I think Greenland will fit the premise of your question in a few years.
There’s not a ton of tourism infrastructure yet, but there are currently a lot of subsidies going into roads, airports, lodging, etc. to induce more tourism.
https://traveltrade.visitgreenland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Strategi-EN-feb2021.pdf
Fallout 76. Granted, I played it almost a year after release.
I found it to be a very good game overall. Not as good as New Vegas or FO3, but I thought it was better than FO4.
That’s where the “definitely just a balloon, don’t pay any attention” landed after the Chinese spy balloon was shot down about a year ago.
At least that’s the first time I heard of Dead Horse.
Two nuclear states engaging in combat; what an incredible risk that poses to the entire world.
I’m not splitting hairs over dead vs wounded.
The headline says thousands were gunned down (dead and wounded: total casualties), but the article says combined dead and wounded are in the hundreds.
I’m “splitting hairs” over the headline exaggerating an already horrific event by an order of magnitude.
No. The article says the number wounded is likely in the hundreds. The headline is exaggerating a tragic event.
Here’s a really good podcast episode from 99% Invisible about this exact topic.
You’re right, SATA isn’t going anywhere for a very long time. If you have a need for 4+ TB of total storage there is nothing at all wrong using HDDs or 2.5" SSDs.
Alas, Babylon. Earth Abides. On The Beach. The Road. One Second After (this one is meh).
If you want some other good collapse survival books similar to Lucifer’s Hammer.
A little ironic considering France’s recently approved plans for mass surveillance.
Pretty sure you’re remembering “Life After People” from the History channel.
“We have the people we need. We have the training that we need. We have the equipment that we need to fight and win," Lt Colonel Omar Minott, who is among the 1,500 to be deployed, said.
Oh, so it’s completely different this time around. They’ve got it figured out now, everyone.
You’re being obtuse and misleading. OP is clearly referring to alleged Iraqi WMDs in the lead up, and justification for, the 2003 invasion.
Stockpiles of WMDs were never found in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
The ISG has not found evidence that Saddam possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but [there is] the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq, although not of a militarily significant capability."
Removing the window screens in the winter helps a lot too.
Regular exercise (every other day at least) makes a big difference for me.
Removed by mod
A Very Brady Sequel.