There’s like 2 FAQs linked by OP, you could have looked at them…
There’s like 2 FAQs linked by OP, you could have looked at them…
rather than the far more likely situation of rewrites and editing.
At this point that feels like the bigger assumption
You’re missing the point of the comment you’re replying to, which is that the devs don’t understand decompilers RIGHT NOW, and it’s formatted in a tongue in cheek way similar to their current comment about VCS
Problem in this case is the specification is vague on what the ‘correct’ thing to display is.
I think you messed up the link formatting :)
Right. I see there’s no logical discussion to be had here. Have a good day.
My question was very simple and limited in scope:
Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?
I did not make any sweeping comments, and I would appreciate if you stopped trying to claim things on my behalf.
Fuck knows. It’s not like I made any such claim, you just decided to put up a strawman argument.
Since when could someone do this … with a couple of clicks and zero training, for free and on any device?
You know, somebody probably said the exact same thing about Photoshop when it first came out? Back when cutting up photos and pasting them together was a thing. Then again, somebody probably said the same thing about the advent of photography too, during the days of woodcuts and oil paintings.
Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?
?
Of the numerous articles I’ve posted thus far, exactly ONE series (about the Supreme Court scandal) could reasonably be said to directly concern US politics.
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
It’s never been on sale, but the price HAS gone up multiple times since it was first launched in alpha.
There isn’t even any risk, considering the amount of detail they’ve covered in the dev blogs.
The warnings are self-serving, not the AI
If it helps, I agreed with your 1st 2 points. You may die with your dignity half intact.
“Sam Altman or Elon Musk about the “existential risk” artificial general intelligence poses to humanity”
The full quote is “UNLIKE self-serving warnings from Sam Altman or Elon Musk about the “existential risk” artificial general intelligence poses to humanity”. In other words, they’re actively denigrating Musk and Altman, and you’ve taken the quote entirely out of context, in direct opposite to the original meaning.
What article did you read, seeing as there’s nothing from Musk in there?
Getting to space. Fuck Musk, but SpaceX is doing great work.
It’s sneaking up on something, 90s cartoon style