• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月28日

help-circle
  • I think where it shines is in helping you write code you’ve never written before. I never touched Swift before and I made a fully functional iOS app in a week. Also, even with stuff I have done before, I can say “write me a function that does x” and it will and it usually works.

    Like just yesterday I asked it to write me a function that would generate and serve up an .ics file based on a selected date and extrapolate the date of a recurring monthly meeting based on the day of the week picked and its position (1st week, 2nd week, etc) within the month and then make the .ics file reflect all that. I could have generated that code myself by hand but it would have probably taken me an hour or two. It did it in about five seconds and it worked perfectly.

    Yeah, you have to know what you’re doing in general and there’s a lot of babysitting involved, but anyone who thinks it’s just useless is plain wrong. It’s fucking amazing.

    Edit: lol the article is referring to a study that was using GPT 3.5, which is all but useless for coding. 4.0 has been out for a year blowing everybody’s minds. Clickbait trash.




  • What is religion, if not conjecture about the origin of mankind (and by extension the universe) that people believe without evidence?

    Religion identifies the simulator and insists that its intermediaries can offer a liaison between you and them, and also that if you don’t believe in their particular simulator, you will be punished. It has been used for centuries to control the populace and to take their money.

    A proponent of simulation theory isn’t likely to tell you that it solves any philosophical problems, or that they now understand the universe wholly. I’ve never heard anyone talking about it claim that they know who/what is behind the simulation.

    So IMO the distinction between the two couldn’t be more clear.

    I imagine there’s at least a couple wacko groups out of there trying to twist simulation theory into a purely religious endeavor, but that wouldn’t represent the mainstream conversation about it.


  • Supervisor194@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml6÷2(1+2)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 个月前

    ChatGPT’s Answer:

    The expression 6/2(1+2) involves both multiplication and division. According to the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS), you should perform operations inside parentheses first, then any multiplication or division from left to right.

    Let’s break down the expression step by step:

    Inside the parentheses: 1 + 2 = 3

    Now the expression becomes 6/2 * 3

    Division: 6/2 = 3

    Multiplication: 3 * 3 = 9

    So, 6/2(1+2) is equal to 9.


  • Supervisor194@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlIt's a simple world view
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    7 个月前

    Amazingly well put. Capitalism is necessary. Unrestrained capitalism is deadly. The unfortunate reality of capitalism is that even as it is in the process of burning everything to the ground, it looks for all the world like glorious success. And it is glorious success, if you don’t compare it to what could be in a system where it was properly restrained.












  • I recently bought a not-smart TV, and it was cheaper than the smart ones. The brand is Sceptre, 65" 4K UHD and - I just checked - it is still selling for $378 at a popular American box retailer’s website who will remain unnamed. 75" is selling for $498.

    I absolutely hate the software-ification of everything. It’s worse than worthless. Last TV I bought has held up for almost a decade now. It is 55" and it cost me almost $800, which was a steal at the time. I was kinda floored by the price of the new one, and the picture’s pretty sweet too.